High spam catch rates continue in latest spam filter test

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Dec 14, 2015

US presidential candidates regularly see their emails blocked by spam filters.

Yet again, there was good news for most participants in the bi-monthly VBSpam spam filters tests: spam catch rates for most products remained very high.

There was good news when it came to false positives too. Solutions blocked few to no emails from the corpus of regular legitimate emails, and few 'newsletters' too. This resulted in 14 VBSpam awards, with no fewer than eight products — Bitdefender, Egedian, ESET, FortiMail, Kaspersky, modusGate, SpamTitan and ZEROSPAM — earning a VBSpam+ award.

The VBSpam report can be downloaded here in HTML-format or here as a PDF.

This month, we also subscribed to newsletters from several US presidential candidates, giving us 23 emails from 10 different candidates in this month's newsletter corpus.

While 23 is a rather small corpus on which to base any firm conclusions, we found that these political emails were seven times more likely than other emails in the newsletter corpus to be blocked by participating spam filters. A small part of this may be explained by the fact that filters had not been trained on these particular emails — no doubt the fact that such emails are exempt from the US CAN-SPAM Act played a big part here too: there is no legal obstacle for US politicians and their staff who want to send unsolicited campaign emails, and many indeed do.

While the emails we received were all solicited, there was still a 10 per cent probability of a spam filter blocking them, which is high in a context in which many products are set to avoid false positives.

The single email from this group that was blocked the most was one from presidential candidate Marco Rubio, asking his alleged supporters to participate in a survey. Rick Santorum was the only politician whose emails (he sent two) weren't blocked by any full solution.

  Many potential Marco Rubio supporters never saw this email, which half of the participating spam filters blocked.

Posted on 14 December 2015 by Martijn Grooten
twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

Security products and HTTPS: let's do it better

A recent paper showed that many HTTPS-intercepting security solutions have implemented TLS rather poorly. Does that mean we should avoid such solutions altogether?

The SHA-1 hashing algorithm has been 'shattered'

Researchers from Google and CWI Amsterdam have created the first known collision of the SHA-1 hashing algorithm, making a very strong case to ditch it.

Throwback Thursday: Once a researcher...

VB was saddened to learn this week of the passing of one of the pioneers of the AV industry, Ross Greenberg. This Throwback Thursday we look back at an interview with Ross in November 1995.

VB2017: What is happening in the threat landscape and what are we doing against it? Submit a proposal in the VB2017 CFP!

Have you analysed a new online threat? Do you know a new way to defend against such threats? Then submit an abstract in the CFP for VB2017!

VB2016 paper: APT reports and OPSEC evolution, or: these are not the APT reports you are looking for

APT reports are great for gaining an understanding of how advanced attack groups operate - however, they can also provide free QA for the threat actors. Today, we publish a VB2016 paper by Gadi Evron (Cymmetria) and Inbar Raz (Perimeter X), who…