Windows XP Professional comparative review

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Jun 28, 2002

After re-testing, Panda Antivirus Platinum's on-access scanner product gains a VB 100% award.

Since the publication of the Windows XP comparative review in the June edition of Virus Bulletin (see VB June 2002, p.16), a number of the tests have continued in the interests of determining the cause of problems which arose during these tests. The following conclusions have been drawn.

Panda Antivirus Platinum

The review noted that Panda Antivirus Platinum's on-access scanner did not function when tested. Clearly this was an issue about which the developers were concerned, and the tests were repeated at that time, gaining the same result.

However, more recent tests, using the same hardware and software, have not demonstrated these problems. The lack of functionality noted in the review cannot, therefore, be taken to be indicative of a reproducible problem with the software.

Discussions with other developers have confirmed that the type of problem described is not uncommon with Windows XP. One theory put forward is that, at boot-up, XP does not always load all operating system components in the same order. With anti-virus programs being interwoven with the OS to an extreme degree, this might be a cause of such oddities.

NAI VirusScan

Also noted in the review was the fact that the sample of W32/Gibe.A was missed In the Wild by NAI VirusScan. This proved to be the result of an update method which, despite updating virus definitions, did not fully update the underlying engine. While this was the update method provided by the vendor, the results are not indicative of those which would have been obtained had SuperDAT files been used rather than DAT files.

The test results as published in the June issue are correct for the older engine tested, however, it should be noted that when subsequent tests were performed using SuperDAT files as an upgrade method, no files were missed by VirusScan In the Wild. Therefore, with the current 4.1.60 engine the product would qualify for the VB 100% award.

Posted on 28 June 2002 by Virus Bulletin

 Tags

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 preview: Unpacking the packed unpacker: reversing an Android anti-analysis library

At VB2018, Google researcher Maddie Stone will present an analysis of the multi-layered 'WeddingCake' anti-analysis library used by many Android malware families.

VB2018 preview: From drive-by download to drive-by mining

At VB2018, Malwarebytes researcher Jérôme Segura will discuss the rise of drive-by cryptocurrency mining, explaining how it works and putting it in the broader context of changes in the cybercrime landscape.

Red Eyes threat group targets North Korean defectors

A research paper by AhnLab researcher Minseok Cha looks at the activities of the Red Eyes threat group (also known as Group 123 and APT 37), whose targets include North Korean defectors, as well as journalists and human rights defenders focused on…

VB announces Threat Intelligence Summit to take place during VB2018

We are very excited to announce a special summit, as part of VB2018, that will be dedicated to all aspects of threat intelligence.

VB2018 Small Talk: An industry approach for unwanted software criteria and clean requirements

An industry approach for defining and detecting unwanted software to be presented and discussed at the Virus Bulletin conference.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.