Erratum: Windows XP comparative review: McAfee VirusScan

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Jul 29, 2002

After re-testing, McAfee's VirusScan product gains a VB 100% award.

Unfortunately an error occurred in Virus Bulletin's Windows XP comparative review (see VB June 2002, p.21): the results for Network Associates' McAfee VirusScan were replaced by those for NAI VirusScan. The correct results for McAfee VirusScan are reproduced in the table below.

The samples missed by VirusScan were mainly in the polymorphic set, where the offending items were Sepultura, W32/CTX and W32/Fosforo. The .TMP file dropped by W32/Nimda.A was undetected both in the XP review and in this month's NetWare tests. The file is included in the standard set as something of a curiosity file since, although it contains Nimda's code and is dropped by Nimda, this file is not a threat under any normal circumstances.

The results reported in the review for clean set scanning and false positives were correct. In light of the fact that no false positives were encountered and all In the Wild scans resulted in full detection, McAfee VirusScan is rightfully awarded a VB 100 % award for its performance. VB offers its apologies to Network Associates and to readers for the confusion.

McAfee VirusScanOn DemandOn Access
ITW Filenumber missed00
% detection100%100%
ITW Bootnumber missed00
% detection100%100%
ITW Overallnumber missed00
% detection100%100%
Macro Virusnumber missed00
% detection100%100%
Polymorphicnumber missed88
% detection99.86%99.86%
Standardnumber missed12
% detection99.98%99.87%


Posted on 29 August 2002 by Virus Bulletin

 Tags

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 paper: Internet balkanization: why are we raising borders online?

At VB2018 in Montreal, Ixia researcher Stefan Tanase presented a thought-provoking paper on the current state of the Internet and the worrying tendency towards raising borders and restricting the flow of information. Today we publish both his paper…

The malspam security products miss: banking and email phishing, Emotet and Bushaloader

The set-up of the VBSpam test lab gives us a unique insight into the kinds of emails that are more likely to bypass email filters. This week we look at the malspam that was missed: banking and email phishing, Emotet and Bushaloader.

VB2018 paper: Where have all the good hires gone?

The cybersecurity skills gap has been described as one of the biggest challenges facing IT leaders today. At VB2018 in Montreal, ESET's Lysa Myers outlined some of the things the industry can do to help address the problem. Today we publish Lysa's…

Preview: Nullcon 2019

We look forward the Nullcon 2019 conference in Goa, India, at which VB Editor Martijn Grooten will give a talk on the state of malware.

From Amazon to Emotet: a look at those phishing and malware emails that bypassed email security products

We see a lot of spam in the VBSpam test lab, and we also see how well such emails are being blocked by email security products. Recently some of the emails that bypassed security products included a broken Amazon phishing campaign, a large fake UPS…

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.