Watching and waiting for Sobig

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Aug 26, 2003

On 22 August 2003 anti-virus experts and sysadmins worldwide waited to discover what events, if any, would unfold when Sobig.F began a synchronized attack.

Anti-virus experts and sysadmins worldwide waited to discover what events, if any, would unfold when Sobig.F began a synchronized attack at 1900h GMT on Friday 22 August 2003 and subsequent second phase of attack at the same time on Sunday.

The worm was set to contact 20 predefined IP addresses (encrypted within the virus body) on UDP port 8998, which would then redirect infected machines to a URL from which an unknown program would be downloaded and run.

In the event, the attack failed: all 20 of the IP addresses were inaccessible during the first phase. With reported assistance from the FBI and Royal Canadian Mounted Police, 19 of the 20 servers were taken offline and there were no signs of the virus being able to connect to the one remaining server.

Two days later, the second stage of attack was equally unsuccessful: although four of the servers started responding to pings just before the attack began - three of which were listening on port 8998 - none of them responded when sent the worm's eight-byte activation code.

Theories and rumours abound as to the identity of the author of Sobig.F and its predecessors: a number of experts believe the worm is the work of email spammers attempting to build an infrastructure for a spam attack of epic proportion; others believe that a highly organized group of hackers has orchestrated the attack, while it has even been speculated that an individual likened to comic book villain Lex Luther is behind the worm.

Unfortunately for would-be superhero AV researchers, all theories currently remain speculation. Meanwhile, a detailed look at the Sobig family is planned for the October issue of Virus Bulletin.

Posted on 26 August 2003 by Virus Bulletin

 Tags

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

A crime against statistics that is probably worse than the cyber attacks faced in County Durham

A report on the number of cyber attacks faced by UK local authorities is a good example of how the large numbers seen in many reports on security are rather meaningless.

NCSC gives important advice on lateral movement

The UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has provided helpful and practical advice on preventing and detecting lateral movement by an attacker within a network.

What kind of people attend Virus Bulletin conferences?

If you are considering submitting a proposal for a talk to VB2018 and you're not familiar with the event, you may find it useful to know what kind of people attend the conference.

Olympic Games target of malware, again

An unattributed malware attack has disrupted some computer systems of the 2018 Winter Olympics. In 1994, a computer virus also targeted the Winter Olympics.

There are lessons to be learned from government websites serving cryptocurrency miners

Thousands of websites, including many sites of government organisations in the UK, the US and Sweden, were recently found to have been serving a cryptocurrency miner. More interesting than the incident itself, though, are the lessons that can be…