One in four consider online banking unsafe

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Nov 15, 2007

Virus Bulletin finds that one in four users consider online banking to be unsafe, but manage their accounts online regardless, while 50% of users consider online banking to be risk free.

In a survey of more than 370 visitors to www.virusbtn.com - many of whom are security professionals - a mere 23% of users said they did not use online banking, while the remaining 77% either said they consider it to be completely safe or said they consider it to be unsafe, but use it anyway.

"It's a little worrying that so many people consider online banking to be without risk," said John Hawes, Virus Bulletin technical consultant. "Either these people are placing an enormous amount of trust in their banks and their desktop security, or they're dangerously ignorant of the threats of phishing, spyware and identity theft. A healthy sense of risk promotes caution, which is always a good thing when sensitive information is passed over the internet."

Security consultant David Harley and anti-virus researcher Andrew Lee, who assessed the effectiveness of anti-phishing quizzes at this year's Virus Bulletin conference, agree. "People shouldn't think of online banking as risk-free," said Harley, who is Director of IT security consultancy Small Blue-Green World and the administrator for anti-virus network AVIEN. "Every authentication is a leap of faith: users are trusting the end site to secure both the transaction process and their data; they're trusting application providers to design and maintain programs securely; they're trusting their ISP (or, often, their employer) to maintain a reasonably secure connection," he continued. "That's an awful lot of trust, but we can't usually eliminate the risk by managing all those aspects of a transaction ourselves."

Lee, who is Chief Research Officer at anti-virus vendor ESET, says it's all about managing risks: "Life is about managing risk, we do things every day that are intrinsically unsafe - like driving for instance - but most of us get away with it, so it's not a bad thing that people manage their accounts online despite thinking it's unsafe." However, he says that customers do need to take responsibility for their actions: "Customers need to realize that the way they behave online is equally important as it is in the real world. Just because you're physically alone in the room, doesn't mean you're alone on the internet."

David Harley concurs: "If users rely totally on security applications to protect them from risks they don't understand, their risk also increases. The effectiveness of security programs is often underrated, but it certainly isn't 100% effective." And in the end, he points out, "it may not matter at all how effectively and securely their bank manages its business processes if a customer somehow becomes convinced that a phishing site is the real thing."

Earlier this week, Eugene Kaspersky, the founder of anti-virus vendor Kaspersky, admitted to an audience in Amsterdam that he doesn't use online banking himself. According to Dutch website security.nl, Kaspersky admitted he might be a bit paranoid, but he believes that in the end this is the most secure way to behave.

The results of the Virus Bulletin poll can be seen here.

Posted on 15 November 2007 by Virus Bulletin

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 paper: From Hacking Team to hacked team to…?

Today we publish the VB2018 paper and video by ESET researcher Filip Kafka, who looked at the new malware by Hacking Team, after the company had recovered from the 2015 breach.

The spam that is hardest to block is often the most damaging

We see a lot of spam in the VBSpam test lab, and we also see how well such emails are being blocked by email security products. Worryingly, it is often the emails with a malicious attachment or a phishing link that are most likely to be missed.

Throwback Thursday: We're all doomed

Mydoom turns 15 this month, and is still being seen in email attachments. This Throwback Thursday we look back to March 2004, when Gabor Szappanos tracked the rise of W32/Mydoom.

VB2019 call for papers - now open!

Have you analysed a new online threat? Do you know a new way to defend against such threats? Are you tasked with securing systems and fending off attacks? The call for papers for VB2019 is now open and we want to hear from you!

VB2018 paper: Unpacking the packed unpacker: reversing an Android anti-analysis library

Today, we publish a VB2018 paper by Google researcher Maddie Stone in which she looks at one of the most interesting anti-analysis native libraries in the Android ecosystem. We also release the recording of Maddie's presentation.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.