AV-Test release latest results

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Sep 2, 2008

Major test of suite products completed

Independent testing body AV-Test.org has released the results of a major comparative of suite products, with many vendors' 2009 editions included in the results. The test covers a range of metrics, including detection rates over various types of malware including adware and spyware, false positive rates, scanning speed, proactive detection, and response times to outbreaks.

In terms of pure detection rates in on-demand scanning, a beta version of GDATA's AVK 2009 topped the charts for both 'malware' (measured against 1,164,662 samples) and 'ad- and spyware' (94,291 samples), with Avira's Premium Security Suite 2008 a close runner-up in the former category and F-Secure 2009 placing second in the latter. Secure Computing's Webwasher gateway product, based on the Avira engine with some in-house heuristics, came third in both categories.

Other areas analysed were scored on a five-point scale from very good to very poor. 'Proactive' protection included scanning of files discovered after the freezing of products, and executing unrecognised malware to test behavioural protection. Products rating 'good' or better in every category include Avira's premium suite (the popular free version has less complete spyware detection), AVK 2009, F-Secure's 2009 suite, Symantec's Norton I.S. 2009 (still in beta) and Sophos's Security Suite 2.5. All products taking part in the test managed to achieve a 'good' or better in at least one category.

The test also included keeping a record of the number of updates released over a four-week period. Of course, these numbers on their own cannot be used to measure the quality of the products involved, but were recorded out of interest. The most interesting data to emerge from this measurement was that the 2009 version of Norton topped the table with an impressive 6,202 incremental micro-updates, issued several times per hour, while Kaspersky came a distant second with a mere 696. Half of the 34 products tested had fewer than 100, including those from McAfee (21) and Trend Micro (30).

A summary of the major areas tested is printed below; hover over the product names to see full version information.

Productmalware on demandadware / spyware on demandfalse positivesscan speedproactive detectionresponse timesmalware on demandadware / spyware on demand
AntiVir (Avira)++++ (4)++++++99.8%99.0%
Avast! (Alwil)++++++oo99.3%98.3%
AVG+- (4)++oo95.8%87.0%
AVK 2008 (G Data) (1)++++o-+++99.2%99.1%
AVK 2009 (G Data) (2)++++++++++99.8%99.8%
BitDefender 2008+-+-+++97.7%87.8%
BitDefender 2009+-+o+++97.6%88.0%
CA-AV (VET)----++o---65.5%68.0%
ClamAV-o----++88.5%92.8%
Dr Web---oo+o84.9%89.6%
eScan++o-+++97.8%97.4%
Fortinet-GWo--o++++92.6%81.9%
F-Prot (Frisk)oo++oo94.8%92.6%
F-Secure 2008+++++o+++98.2%98.4%
F-Secure 2009++++++++++99.2%99.6%
Ikarus++++o+++99.5%98.6%
K7 Computingooo++-o92.1%94.0%
Kaspersky++++oo+++98.4%98.3%
McAfeeoo++o+-93.6%94.5%
Microsoft++++o--97.7%97.1%
Nod32 (Eset)oo+++++++94.4%94.7%
Norman+++o+o96.3%95.8%
Norton 2008 (Symantec)+o++++o97.8%94.6%
Norton 2009 (Symantec)++++++++++98.7%95.4%
Panda 2008-o++++o86.4%93.4%
Panda 2009o++++++91.8%95.6%
Rising----+ooo83.4%77.5%
Sophos+++++++97.5%95.0%
Trend Microo-++o+91.3%88.5%
TrustPort++++---++++99.5%98.4%
VBA32o-oo+o90.5%85.2%
VirusBuster--++oo89.0%85.8%
WebWasher-GW (3)++++o++++++99.7%99.2%
ZoneAlarm++oo+++97.8%97.7%
Indexmalware on demandadware / spyware on demandfalse positivesscan speedproactive detectionresponse timesmalware on demandadware / spyware on demand
++>98%>98%no FP< 2 h
+>95%>95%1-2 FP2 - 4 h
o>90%>90%3-4 FP4 - 6 h
->85%>85%5-6 FP6 - 8 h
--<85%<85%> 6 FP> 8 h

Notes
(1) AVK 2008 uses the Avast and Kaspersky scan engines
(2) AVK 2009 uses the Avast and BitDefender scan engines
(3) WebWasher uses the Avira engine and a self-developed heuristic engine
(4) the free (personal) edition does not include ad- and spyware detection, so the results would be --

Posted on 02 September 2008 by Virus Bulletin

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2020 call for papers - now open!

Have you analysed a new online threat? Do you know a new way to defend against such threats? Are you tasked with securing systems and fending off attacks? The call for papers for VB2020 is now open and we want to hear from you!

VB2019 paper: Operation Soft Cell - a worldwide campaign against telecommunication providers

Today we publish the VB2019 paper by Cybereason researchers Mor Levi, Amit Serper and Assaf Dahan on Operation Soft Cell, a targeted attack against telecom providers around the world.

VB2019 paper: A study of Machete cyber espionage operations in Latin America

At VB2019 in London a group of researchers from the Stratosphere Lab at the Czech Technical University in Prague presented a paper in which they analysed and dissected the cyber espionage activities of an APT group in Latin America through the…

VB2019 paper: The push from fiction for increased surveillance, and its impact on privacy

In a paper presented at VB2019 in London, researchers Miriam Cihodariu (Heimdal Security) and Andrei Bogdan Brad (Code4Romania) looked at how surveillance is represented in fiction and how these representations are shaping people's attitudes to…

VB2019 paper: Oops! It happened again!

At VB2019 in London industry veterans Righard Zwienenberg and Eddy Willems took a detailed look at the relationship between past and current cyber threats. Today, we publish both their paper and the recording of their presentation.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.