Vulnerability test raises hackles

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Oct 17, 2008

Secunia suite trial slates lack of PoC detection, but test methods called into question.

Vulnerability specialist Secunia published the results of a trial of internet security suites this week, with stark findings showing very poor detection rates of the selection of exploits and proof-of-concept overruns used. However, the test has run into considerable criticism from several angles.

Secunia's test focused on 300 known vulnerabilities, around half of them based on file types and the other half based on web pages. These were represented mostly by payload-free proof-of-concept attacks designed to trigger vulnerabilities, and in some cases prove that code execution could be achieved, while some fully fledged exploits were also included. A dozen 'Internet Security' suites were lined up and set to scan the files and web pages in question, and of them only Symantec's Norton product put in any kind of a performance, achieving just over 20% of all samples and just over 30% of those deemed 'important'. No other product detected more than 2.5% of the full testset, or better than 4% of the most dangerous items.

In the wake of the test's publication, a range of criticisms have been levelled at Secunia, mostly focusing on the test methodology, which many claim failed to properly exercise any of the protection features included in these suites beyond the basic anti-virus scanner. Many product developers have claimed that if the vulnerabilities had actually been triggered, rather than scanned statically, other technologies would have kicked in to block any resulting exploits, and that in many cases payloads would be more likely to be blocked than the first stages of exploitation.

Others have criticised the lack of clarity and openness about how the testing was carried out, and some have seen the whole business as a stunt to promote Secunia's own vulnerability scanning products and services. A blogger at Kaspersky Lab points out that it is a far better policy to patch vulnerabilities as soon as they are discovered, rather than leaving holes open and relying on other software to block anything that tries to wriggle through, an angle which Kaspersky's integrated vulnerability scanner, like those offered by eEye Blink and BitDefender, attempts to cover. Secunia representatives themselves claim, in a blog entry announcing their results, that there is a serious lack of proper and timely patching among home users and businesses alike.

Full details of the Secunia test are published in a PDF here, with some comment from the company here. Further comment is in The Register here, on the Sunbelt blog here or at Panda here.

Posted on 17 October 2008 by Virus Bulletin

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2020 TIPS presentations: cybercrime in the DACH region and ransomware in LATAM

As part of VB2020 localhost we were proud to co-host the Threat Intelligence Practitioners' Summmit (TIPS), put together by the Cyber Threat Alliance. In a series of blog posts we highlight some of the talks presented in the Summit and the important…

VB2020 TIPS presentation: Intelligence Sharing for Supply Chain Security

As part of VB2020 localhost we were proud to co-host the Threat Intelligence Practitioners' Summmit (TIPS), put together by the Cyber Threat Alliance. In a series of blog posts we highlight some of the talks presented in the Summit and the important…

VB2020 localhost is over, but the content is still available to view!

VB2020 localhost - VB's first foray into the world of virtual conferences - took place last week, but you can still watch all the presentations.

New additions complete the VB2020 localhost programme

The programme for VB2020 localhost - the first virtual, and entirely free to attend VB conference - is now complete, with new additions to both the live programme and the on-demand programme.

VB2020 localhost call for last minute papers: a unique opportunity

Why VB2020 localhost presents a unique opportunity for you to share your research with security experts around the globe.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.