Vulnerability test raises hackles

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Oct 17, 2008

Secunia suite trial slates lack of PoC detection, but test methods called into question.

Vulnerability specialist Secunia published the results of a trial of internet security suites this week, with stark findings showing very poor detection rates of the selection of exploits and proof-of-concept overruns used. However, the test has run into considerable criticism from several angles.

Secunia's test focused on 300 known vulnerabilities, around half of them based on file types and the other half based on web pages. These were represented mostly by payload-free proof-of-concept attacks designed to trigger vulnerabilities, and in some cases prove that code execution could be achieved, while some fully fledged exploits were also included. A dozen 'Internet Security' suites were lined up and set to scan the files and web pages in question, and of them only Symantec's Norton product put in any kind of a performance, achieving just over 20% of all samples and just over 30% of those deemed 'important'. No other product detected more than 2.5% of the full testset, or better than 4% of the most dangerous items.

In the wake of the test's publication, a range of criticisms have been levelled at Secunia, mostly focusing on the test methodology, which many claim failed to properly exercise any of the protection features included in these suites beyond the basic anti-virus scanner. Many product developers have claimed that if the vulnerabilities had actually been triggered, rather than scanned statically, other technologies would have kicked in to block any resulting exploits, and that in many cases payloads would be more likely to be blocked than the first stages of exploitation.

Others have criticised the lack of clarity and openness about how the testing was carried out, and some have seen the whole business as a stunt to promote Secunia's own vulnerability scanning products and services. A blogger at Kaspersky Lab points out that it is a far better policy to patch vulnerabilities as soon as they are discovered, rather than leaving holes open and relying on other software to block anything that tries to wriggle through, an angle which Kaspersky's integrated vulnerability scanner, like those offered by eEye Blink and BitDefender, attempts to cover. Secunia representatives themselves claim, in a blog entry announcing their results, that there is a serious lack of proper and timely patching among home users and businesses alike.

Full details of the Secunia test are published in a PDF here, with some comment from the company here. Further comment is in The Register here, on the Sunbelt blog here or at Panda here.

Posted on 17 October 2008 by Virus Bulletin

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2020 localhost call for last-minute papers now open!

The call for last-minute papers for VB2020 localhost is now open. Submit before 17 August to have your paper considered for one of the nine slots reserved for 'hot' research!

Announcing... VB2020 localhost

Announcing VB2020 localhost: the carbon neutral, budget neutral VB conference!

VB2019 paper: APT cases exploiting vulnerabilities in region-specific software

At VB2019, JPCERT/CC's Shusei Tomonaga and Tomoaki Tani presented a paper on attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in software used only in Japan, using malware that is unique to Japan. Today we publish both their paper and the recording of their…

New paper: Detection of vulnerabilities in web applications by validating parameter integrity and data flow graphs

In a follow-up to a paper presented at VB2019, Prismo Systems researchers Abhishek Singh and Ramesh Mani detail algorithms that can be used to detect SQL injection in stored procedures, persistent cross-site scripting (XSS), and server‑side request…

VB2020 programme announced

VB is pleased to reveal the details of an interesting and diverse programme for VB2020, the 30th Virus Bulletin International Conference.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.