ICSA Labs report reveals testing details

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Nov 18, 2009

Certification issues unmasked in 20-year lab survey.

Renowned testing and certification group ICSA Labs has released a fascinating report drawing back the curtain on its security product tests - the detailed results of which are generally kept quiet as products go through the process of achieving certification.

Among the most widely noted facts in the report is the large number of products that require multiple cycles through the test programme before they manage to achieve certifiable standards.

As with many certification bodies, ICSA generally reports only the status of those products that have made the grade and been awarded certification, while failure to reach the required standards usually results in a private report to the vendor involved so that they can fix any problems with the product and have another go at the test.

According to the report, only 4% of all products tested achieve certification on the first attempt - although 27% of anti-malware solutions are found to be certifiable from the off, the average is heavily dented by the VPN and web application firewall categories, where no product has ever made the grade without receiving advice and assistance from the certifiers.

While these figures have been picked up by the sensational press as indicators of general inadequacy across the security industry, the report aims to highlight the tough and challenging nature of the certification process, and the efforts gone to by certification labs to work with vendors to improve their solutions, providing expertise and cross-industry cooperation.

The report also provides an overview of the history of ICSA and the security industry and offers advice to both product developers and potential buyers, with a lengthy checklist of criteria to consider when selecting a security solution. The report was created in collaboration with ICSA owner Verizon Business, and was issued as part of the inauguration of a new blog. The first entry of the blog, penned by contributing writer and ICSA MD George Japak, is available here. The report itself can be found here, with comments on the ESET blog here, and in The Register here.

Posted on 11 November 2009 by Virus Bulletin

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2019 conference programme announced

VB is excited to reveal the details of an interesting and diverse programme for VB2019, the 29th Virus Bulletin International Conference, which takes place 2-4 October in London, UK.

VB2018 paper: Under the hood - the automotive challenge

Car hacking has become a hot subject in recent years, and at VB2018 in Montreal, Argus Cyber Security's Inbar Raz presented a paper that provides an introduction to the subject, looking at the complex problem, examples of car hacks, and the…

VB2018 paper and video: Android app deobfuscation using static-dynamic cooperation

Static analysis and dynamic analysis each have their shortcomings as methods for analysing potentially malicious files. Today, we publish a VB2018 paper by Check Point researchers Yoni Moses and Yaniv Mordekhay, in which they describe a method that…

VB2019 call for papers closes this weekend

The call for papers for VB2019 closes on 17 March, and while we've already received many great submissions, we still want more!

Registration open for VB2019 ─ book your ticket now!

Registration for VB2019, the 29th Virus Bulletin International Conference, is now open, with an early bird rate available until 1 July.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.