AV-Test.org issues latest round of testing results

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Aug 16, 2010

Symantec and Microsoft outdo Trend and McAfee in live tests.

Independent testing organisation AV-Test.org has released its latest round of test results in a simplified format, providing at-a-glance details of performance in a series of tests aimed at mimicking real-world situations. Testing covered a wide range of criteria, all run in a fully connected and realistic environment to exercise all available protective features.

In the tests, 19 products were put through their paces on Windows 7 in the second quarter of the year, with 13 of them meeting the necessary standard to be marked as 'certified' by the testing body. The results were split into three categories, with 'Protection' covering the blocking of attacks from malicious websites and emails, dynamic detection of executing malware, detection rates over AV-Test's sizeable sample sets and WildList samples. 'Repair' comprises successful removal of common infections, removal of additional items and changes left behind by infections, and detection and removal of rootkits, while 'usability' covers both false alarms and impact on system performance.

High performers in the protection category included AVG, G DATA, Panda and Symantec, all scoring 5.5 out of a possible 6, while the bottom of the table was propped up by Trend Micro (2.5) and Norman (2.0). In the 'repair' category, Avira, Kaspersky and Panda did well with 5.5, while McAfee's Internet Security 2010 was last by some distance with a lowly 2.0. In 'usability', several products scored equally at the top 5.5 mark, including Microsoft's Security Essentials, Symantec's Norton and solutions from BitDefender, F-Secure, G DATA and Kaspersky. Bottom of the list were McAfee, Norman, PC Tools and BullGuard, all scoring less than 4 out of a possible 6.

Scores in each category are totalled up and a total of 12 or more is required to qualify for 'certified' status. 13 of the products included are marked as certified by AV-Test - those failing to make the grade include Bullguard and Norman as well as McAfee and Trend Micro. Results for two further products are still unpublished pending further investigation, but neither is considered likely to achieve certification.

Full details of the test results, including a PDF report on the showing of each product, can be found at the AV-Test.org website, here.

Posted on 16 August 2010 by Virus Bulletin

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2021 localhost videos available on YouTube

VB has made all VB2021 localhost presentations available on the VB YouTube channel, so you can now watch - and share - any part of the conference freely and without registration.

VB2021 localhost is over, but the content is still available to view!

VB2021 localhost - VB's second virtual conference - took place last week, but you can still watch all the presentations.

VB2021 localhost call for last-minute papers

The call for last-minute papers for VB2021 localhost is now open. Submit before 20 August to have your paper considered for one of the slots reserved for 'hot' research!

New article: Run your malicious VBA macros anywhere!

Kurt Natvig explains how he recompiled malicious VBA macro code to valid harmless Python 3.x code.

New article: Dissecting the design and vulnerabilities in AZORult C&C panels

In a new article, Aditya K Sood looks at the command-and-control (C&C) design of the AZORult malware, discussing his team's findings related to the C&C design and some security issues they identified.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.