ENISA calls for revised botnet measurements

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Mar 9, 2011

EU agency says current measures of botnet threat are misleading.

European cyber security agency, ENISA (the European Network and Information Security Agency) has called for a review of how botnets are assessed and measured.

Two studies by the agency are due to be published at a botnet workshop in Cologne today, evaluating both the botnet threat and the effectiveness of countermeasures. The first report, 'Botnets: 10 Tough Questions', concludes that current measures of the botnet threat could be misleading due to the fact that the number of infected machines alone (which is generally the way in which botnet sizes are estimated) does not give an accurate representation of the situation - despite managing to infect millions of computers with malware, the number of botnet assets that operators can control and leverage in an attack is often considerably smaller.

The report reaffirms the conclusions drawn by Damballa's Gunter Ollmann in his paper presented last year at the VB2010 conference (abstract here), in which he analysed how criminal botnet operators really assemble, rally, manage and coordinate their collective of victim computers, and how the number of systems at their direct disposal is considerably smaller than is often assumed.

ENISA's second study evaluates the best methods for combating botnets and makes recommendations covering legal, policy and technical points of view.

'Botnets: 10 Tough Questions' can be downloaded from ENISA's website here.

'Botnets: Measurement, Detection, Disinfection and Defence' can be downloaded from ENISA's website here.

The slides from Gunter Ollmann's VB2010 paper 'Size matters - measuring a botnet operator's pinkie' are available here (PDF).

Posted on 09 March 2011 by Virus Bulletin



Latest posts:

VB2019 call for papers - now open!

Have you analysed a new online threat? Do you know a new way to defend against such threats? Are you tasked with securing systems and fending off attacks? The call for papers for VB2019 is now open and we want to hear from you!

VB2018 paper: Unpacking the packed unpacker: reversing an Android anti-analysis library

Today, we publish a VB2018 paper by Google researcher Maddie Stone in which she looks at one of the most interesting anti-analysis native libraries in the Android ecosystem. We also release the recording of Maddie's presentation.

VB2018 paper: Draw me like one of your French APTs – expanding our descriptive palette for cyber threat actors

Today, we publish the VB2018 paper by Chronicle researcher Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, who argues we should change the way we talk about APT actors.

Book Review: Cyber Wars

VB Editor Martijn Grooten reviews Charles Arthur's Cyber Wars, which looks at seven prominent hacks and attacks, and the lessons we can learn from them.

VB2018 paper: Office bugs on the rise

At VB2018 Sophos researcher Gábor Szappanos provided a detailed overview of Office exploit builders, and looked in particular at the widely exploited CVE-2017-0199. Today we publish his paper and release the video of his presentation.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.