200-fold increase in HTML-attachment spam

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Feb 16, 2012

Cutwail botnet likely behind campaign that sends users to Phoenix exploit kit.

Researchers at M86 have reported a significant increase in the amount of spam sent with malicious HTML attachments, the volume of which on some days was 200 times that on the first day of the year.

HTML, the mark-up language used to create web pages, is commonly used in email to display various fonts and colours and to embed images. All modern email clients are capable of displaying HTML emails, though it is good practice for these to contain a text-part as well. A slight modification to the emails means the HTML-part is seen as an attachment that can be viewed in a web browser, rather than shown within the email client. It is this that is being used in a large spam campaign, of which M86 believes the Cutwail botnet is the perpetrator.

These particular emails - which either have the subject 'End of August statement' or come with a 'Xerox scan' attached - contain an HTML attachment in which, through obfuscated JavaScript, an iframe is embedded. The Phoenix exploit kit is loaded in the iframe, which attempts to infect the user through exploits in various browsers and plug-ins.

The tactic of infecting users via iframes and obfuscated JavaScript is commonly used for drive-by downloads, mostly in compromised legitimate websites. By using an HTML attachment rather than a website, this kind of attack is less likely to be picked up by web filters, while spam filters may not attempt to de-obfuscate the JavaScript, thus making it less likely for URL blacklists to block the emails.

HTML-attachment spam made the news last month when it was said that users could be infected without opening the attachments. While it is not impossible for an email client to open the attachment and render the JavaScript, either through a bug or through bad design, it seems unlikely for this to happen. We have not found evidence of an email client with that property.

More at M86 here. The original story on the emails allegedly infecting users without the need to open an attachment is at eleven here, with comments from Sophos's Naked Security blog here.

Posted on 16 February 2012 by Virus Bulletin

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

WannaCry shows we need to understand why organizations don't patch

Perhaps the question we should be asking about WannaCry is not "why do so many organizations allow unpatched machines to exist on their networks?" but "why doesn't patching work reasonably well most of the time?"

Modern security software is not necessarily powerless against threats like WannaCry

The WannaCry ransomware has affected many organisations around the world, making it probably the worst and most damaging of its kind. But modern security is not necessarily powerless against such threats.

Throwback Thursday: CARO: A personal view

This week sees the 11th International CARO Workshop taking place in Krakow, Poland – a prestigious annual meeting of anti-malware and security experts. As a founding member of CARO, Fridrik Skulason was well placed, in August 1994, to shed some light…

VB2016 paper: Uncovering the secrets of malvertising

Malicious advertising, a.k.a. malvertising, has evolved tremendously over the past few years to take a central place in some of today’s largest web-based attacks. It is by far the tool of choice for attackers to reach the masses but also to target…

Throwback Thursday: Tools of the DDoS Trade

As DDoS attacks become costlier to fix and continue to increase in both number and diversity, we turn back the clock to 2000, when Aleksander Czarnowski took a look at the DDoS tools of the day.