Firefox 17 zero-day exploit targets users of Tor network

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Aug 5, 2013

Visitors to child abuse websites likely target of operation, but will there be collateral damage?

A zero-day exploit in Firefox 17 that was probably used to track the visitors to child abuse websites hosted on the Tor network will spark further debate on the notion of "good malware" and could lead to very serious false positives.

Tor is software for online anonymity - it uses encrypted connections routed via a number of nodes to effectievly hide the user's real location. It can be used both to bypass censorship and to access a service without giving details about one's real location. Tor Hidden Services takes this concept one step further: here, the service itself is also hidden by the Tor network and its real location cannot be discovered.

Tor Hidden Services, which uses the pseudo top-level domain .onion, is used for instance by The New Yorker in its Strongbox service, where informers can share data with the magazine anonymously. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Tor service is also popular in the darker echelons of the web. 'The Silk Road', a black market only accessible through Tor, made the news recently when it was used to send heroin to security blogger Brian Krebs in an attempt to incriminate him. A number of sites for sharing child abuse images are also known to be hosted on Tor.

 Description of 'Freedom Hosting' on 'The Hidden Wiki', itself a Tor Hidden Service.

Of course, even sites hosted on Tor Hidden Services have a real location, and it is believed that many sites were hosted at Freedom Hosting - a hosting service that was known to turn a blind eye to illegal activities on its network. Freedom Hosting is believed to have been run by Eric Eoin Marques, a 28-year-old with dual Irish-American citizenship, who was arrested in Ireland over the weekend and described as the "largest child-porn dealer on the planet".

At the same time, sites hosted at Freedom Hosting are believed to have been serving a zero-day exploit for Firefox 17. While not the latest version of the popular browser, it is what the Tor Browser bundle is based on. The Tor Browser bundle is probably the easiest way to access Tor Hidden Services and will have been used by many of those visiting the sites.

The exploit did no more than send the user's real IP address to a server in the United States - which makes it likely that it was run by a law enforcement agency. Given the comments made by the FBI regarding Marques' arrest, it is likely that the operation targeted those visiting child abuse websites.

The anti-malware community has always been pretty univocal on the use of malware for "good" purposes - which is something that, if not morally wrong, is at least considered something security solutions should still protect against. Of course, there are many who will not be at all displeased at the idea of this exploit leading to the arrest of people who helped enable child abuse.

But things are a little more complicated than that. Not all Tor services hosted at Freedom Hosting were illegal. Tor Mail, an anonymous email service, is also believed to have been hosted at Freedom Hosting; indeed, it has been down since the weekend. From the analysis seen online, it appears that the exploit does not include details on which particular services were accessed by the user.

It would not be a good thing if the anonymity of those accessing legal services hosted on the Tor network were breached. But it would be seriously wrong if those people were thrown on the same pile as those accessing child abuse websites: a false accusation of enabling child abuse can have serious consequences and should be avoided at all costs.

Finally, it is a sad and sobering thought to realise that it is far from clear that this operation will have done anything to help the victims of child abuse.

Brian Krebs has a good summary of what happened on his blog here, while the official response from The Tor Project - which stresses that it is in no way affiliated with Freedom Hosting - can be found here.

Posted on 5 August 2013 by Martijn Grooten



Latest posts:

WannaCry shows we need to understand why organizations don't patch

Perhaps the question we should be asking about WannaCry is not "why do so many organizations allow unpatched machines to exist on their networks?" but "why doesn't patching work reasonably well most of the time?"

Modern security software is not necessarily powerless against threats like WannaCry

The WannaCry ransomware has affected many organisations around the world, making it probably the worst and most damaging of its kind. But modern security is not necessarily powerless against such threats.

Throwback Thursday: CARO: A personal view

This week sees the 11th International CARO Workshop taking place in Krakow, Poland – a prestigious annual meeting of anti-malware and security experts. As a founding member of CARO, Fridrik Skulason was well placed, in August 1994, to shed some light…

VB2016 paper: Uncovering the secrets of malvertising

Malicious advertising, a.k.a. malvertising, has evolved tremendously over the past few years to take a central place in some of today’s largest web-based attacks. It is by far the tool of choice for attackers to reach the masses but also to target…

Throwback Thursday: Tools of the DDoS Trade

As DDoS attacks become costlier to fix and continue to increase in both number and diversity, we turn back the clock to 2000, when Aleksander Czarnowski took a look at the DDoS tools of the day.