CVE-2012-0158 continues to be used in targeted attacks

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Oct 31, 2014

30-month old vulnerability still a popular way to infect systems.

If all you have to worry about are zero-day vulnerabilities, you have got things pretty well sorted. Although it is true that sometimes zero-days are being used to deliver malware (such as the recent use of CVE-2014-4114 by the SandWorm group), in many cases even the more targeted attacks get away with using older, long patched vulnerabilities, exploiting the fact that many users and organisations don't patch as quickly as they should — if at all.

CVE-2012-0158 is one such vulnerability. Patched in April 2012, the buffer overflow vulnerability exists in certain ActiveX controls and can be exploited via a malicious Word, Excel or RTF file.

Despite its age, the vulnerability continues to be used by various attack groups that all appear to operate in the Western Australian time zone. Examples of such groups include the 'Shiqiang Gang' (as reported by McAfee), 'PLEAD' (as reported by Trend Micro), 'NetTraveler' (as reported by Kaspersky) and 'APT12' (as reported by FireEye). Today, G Data published a report on 'TooHash', yet another operation that uses CVE-2012-0158 to infect victims.

Given a number of similarities between these attacks, it is possible that some of the groups behind it are indeed related. It is also possible that none of them are directly related, but that some use the same third-party to write the exploits. After all, not just 'ordinary' cybercrime is getting increasingly commoditized.

In either case, security researchers would do best not to assume CVE-2012-0158 a problem that is well behind us. Two papers published by Virus Bulletin last year may help you understand the technical details of the vulnerability.

In May, Fortinet researcher Ruhai Zhang wrote an article on CVE-2012-0158, explaining the tricks used in exploits of the vulnerability to remain undetected by anti-virus software.

In a VB2013 conference paper, Paul Baccas and Vanja Svajcer (then both at Sophos) took a deep look at RTF files containing an exploit for the vulnerability. A PDF of their paper can be downloaded here.

Posted on 31 October 2014 by Martijn Grooten

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 preview: Unpacking the packed unpacker: reversing an Android anti-analysis library

At VB2018, Google researcher Maddie Stone will present an analysis of the multi-layered 'WeddingCake' anti-analysis library used by many Android malware families.

VB2018 preview: From drive-by download to drive-by mining

At VB2018, Malwarebytes researcher Jérôme Segura will discuss the rise of drive-by cryptocurrency mining, explaining how it works and putting it in the broader context of changes in the cybercrime landscape.

Red Eyes threat group targets North Korean defectors

A research paper by AhnLab researcher Minseok Cha looks at the activities of the Red Eyes threat group (also known as Group 123 and APT 37), whose targets include North Korean defectors, as well as journalists and human rights defenders focused on…

VB announces Threat Intelligence Summit to take place during VB2018

We are very excited to announce a special summit, as part of VB2018, that will be dedicated to all aspects of threat intelligence.

VB2018 Small Talk: An industry approach for unwanted software criteria and clean requirements

An industry approach for defining and detecting unwanted software to be presented and discussed at the Virus Bulletin conference.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.