Shellshock used to spread Mayhem

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Oct 8, 2014

Malware switched to more effective Perl installer.

One of the most prominent discussion topics during VB2014 was the 'Shellshock' vulnerability (CVE-2014-6271) in the popular Bash shell for *nix, which was publicly disclosed while the conference was going on in Seattle.

  The name 'Shellshock' started as a joke on Twitter.

Considered at least as serious as Heartbleed, Shellshock affects millions of servers. A successful exploit allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code by making use of the fact that many processes set environment variables in Bash and, under certain circumstances, Bash execute commands concatenated to the end of such variables.

Although exploiting the vulnerability isn't as straightforward as it is for Heartbleed, the potential attack surface is much larger and a lucky attacker might even be able to exploit the vulnerability on a server that is not exposed to the Internet. I wouldn't be surprised if, for some time to come, we learn of attacks using Shellshock for lateral movement or to escalate privileges in an advanced attack.

Cybercriminals are already exploiting Shellshock through the most obvious attack vector: vulnerable web servers. On its blog, ZScaler has an overview of various such attacks seen in the wild.

One attack that I found particularly interesting was the use of Shellshock by the 'Mayhem' malware to spread further - something which Malware Must Die! wrote about yesterday.

Earlier this year, we published a paper on Mayhem by three researchers from Yandex in Russia. Mayhem is a piece of malware that runs on *nix servers and is noteworthy because it can act under restricted privileges. It uses various plug-ins to look for and infect other servers.

  Part of Mayhem's Perl installer. Source: Malware Must Die!

When Mayhem exploits Shellshock, it uses it to upload and run an installer written in Perl, thus replacing the original PHP-based installer.

I spoke to Evgeny Sidorov, one of the paper's authors, who said he wasn't surprised that Mayhem's owners are using Shellshock to infect more machines. The malware's flexible architecture made it easy for them to do so and using Shellshock is easier and more effective than brute-forcing WordPress credentials, which had hitherto been used. He also pointed out that using a Perl installer makes sense, given that Perl is installed on almost all *nix servers by default, while PHP is usually only an optional extra.

The good news if you're running Bash - and if you're running anything Linux- or Unix-based, you almost certainly are - is that patching is easy and that doing so is very unlikely to break other software. There is no excuse not to patch.

Posted on 08 October 2014 by Martijn Grooten

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2019 paper: APT cases exploiting vulnerabilities in region-specific software

At VB2019, JPCERT/CC's Shusei Tomonaga and Tomoaki Tani presented a paper on attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in software used only in Japan, using malware that is unique to Japan. Today we publish both their paper and the recording of their…

New paper: Detection of vulnerabilities in web applications by validating parameter integrity and data flow graphs

In a follow-up to a paper presented at VB2019, Prismo Systems researchers Abhishek Singh and Ramesh Mani detail algorithms that can be used to detect SQL injection in stored procedures, persistent cross-site scripting (XSS), and server‑side request…

VB2020 programme announced

VB is pleased to reveal the details of an interesting and diverse programme for VB2020, the 30th Virus Bulletin International Conference.

VB2019 paper: Cyber espionage in the Middle East: unravelling OSX.WindTail

At VB2019 in London, Jamf's Patrick Wardle analysed the WindTail macOS malware used by the WindShift APT group, active in the Middle East. Today we publish both Patrick's paper and the recording of his presentation.

VB2019 paper: 2,000 reactions to a malware attack – accidental study

At VB2019 cybercrime journalist and researcher Adam Haertlé presented an analysis of almost 2000 unsolicited responses sent by victims of a malicious email campaign. Today we publish both his paper and the recording of his presentation.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.