Multi-staged, modular Regin tool enables stealthy surveillance

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Nov 24, 2014

Nation state likely behind campaign that goes back many years.

Few terms are misused in a security context as often as the term 'advanced', perhaps in part because the industry doesn't like to admit that most of the threats we're facing aren't particularly advanced. Yet for the 'Regin' espionage tool, which Symantec wrote about yesterday, it seems fully justified.

Regin has been used in espionage campaigns since at least 2008. It is a multi-staged threat (like Stuxnet) that uses a modular approach (like Flame), thus placing it among the most advanced threats ever detected.

  The five stages of Regin. Source: Symantec.

Though the campaign has only recently been discovered, individual components of Regin have been analysed in the past - for example, F-Secure researcher Antti Tikkanen writes about how his company analysed a malicious driver belonging to the same campaign in early 2009.

There have been victims in many countries, but just over half of the confirmed infections occurred either in Russia (28%) or in Saudi Arabia (24%). Interestingly, almost half of the confirmed infections affected what Symantec refers to as 'private individuals and small businesses'.

Attribution is hard, and Symantec is right to refrain from making guesses about where the actors behind Regin are based. However, given the resources required to build and maintain such a tool, and the fact that Regin's purpose appears to be the gathering of intelligence, the company believes that a nation state is behind it.

More details can be found in a whitepaper (pdf) published by Symantec.

Kaspersky Lab has also published an analysis of Regin. As well as adding more technical details, and the fact that victims were found on the pacific island nations of Fiji and Kiribati, the Kaspersky researchers also report that a large GSM operator was among the targets.

One victim is named explicitly: Belgian cryptography professor Jean-Jacques Quisquater, who is an expert on smartcard encryption. Earlier this year, Quisquater said that he had been the victim of a spear-phishing attack, which he blamed on 'the NSA and/or GCHQ'. Many (myself included) believed that Quisquater might have mistaken an ordinary attack for something more serious. It now appears that Quisquater was right - at least about the seriousness of the threat.

Posted on 24 November 2014 by Martijn Grooten




Latest posts:

First 11 partners of VB2019 announced

We are excited to announce the first 11 companies to partner with VB2019, whose support will help ensure a great event.

VB2018 paper: Fake News, Inc.

A former reporter by profession, Andrew Brandt's curiosity was piqued when he came across what appeared at first glance to be the website of a small-town newspaper based in Illinois, but under scrutiny, things didn’t add up. At VB2018 he presented a…

Paper: Alternative communication channel over NTP

In a new paper published today, independent researcher Nikolaos Tsapakis writes about the possibilities of malware using NTP as a covert communication channel and how to stop this.

VB2019 conference programme announced

VB is excited to reveal the details of an interesting and diverse programme for VB2019, the 29th Virus Bulletin International Conference, which takes place 2-4 October in London, UK.

VB2018 paper: Under the hood - the automotive challenge

Car hacking has become a hot subject in recent years, and at VB2018 in Montreal, Argus Cyber Security's Inbar Raz presented a paper that provides an introduction to the subject, looking at the complex problem, examples of car hacks, and the…

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.