Report: 15 solutions achieve VBSpam award

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Apr 28, 2015

Test process also uncovers job spam illustrative of trend.

Last week, we published our 36th comparative anti-spam test. All but one of the 16 participating full solutions achieved a VBSpam award, all blocking a large percentage of spam, while blocking very few legitimate emails.

Seven products — Bitdefender, ESET, GFI MailEssentials, Kaspersky LMS, IBM Lotus Protector, Libra Esva and Netmail Secure — achieved a VBSpam+ award for blocking more than 99.5% of spam, while generating no false positives at all in the 'ham' corpus, and very few false positives in a separate corpus of newsletters.

  VBSpam quadrant. Click here for a larger version of the quadrant.

This test marks six full years of running VBSpam tests. Looking back over those six years, we notice that the problem of spam hasn't got any worse and remains well mitigated by a number of factors, from industry efforts to spam filters; the latter remain essential for any user of email.

We have also noticed a number of trends over the last six years. One of these is that an increasing amount of spam is being sent from compromised (web) servers, most of which run Linux. We have shown in the past how this kind of spam tends to be harder to block.

Another trend is an increased use of compromised resources. For instance, the use of compromised domains, as opposed to domains set up by the spammers themselves, makes it harder for spam to be blocked based on the presence of a spam domain — at least harder for it to be blocked without a risk of false positives.

We saw a clear example of this in the latest test, when several dozen emails from the same campaign managed to bypass all but a few spam filters in the test.

The campaign targets users in Germany and isn't too hard to spot as job recruitment spam. In fact, the promise of receiving a fair amount of money in return for very little work suggests that the spammers are looking for money mules.

What made these emails difficult to filter was that they were sent from Outlook.com accounts that were likely generated for the purpose. The high delivery rates means that the spammers would have needed to send significantly fewer emails for the campaign to be successful, thus turning spam from a quantitative problem into a qualitative one.

This month's VBSpam report can be viewed here in HTML format, or downloaded here as a PDF.

Posted on 28 April 2015 by Martijn Grooten

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

The road to IPv6 is generally smooth but contains a few potholes

Most of the switch from IPv4 to IPv6 will happen seamlessly. But we cannot assume it won't introduce new security issues.

New paper: Powering the distribution of Tesla stealer with PowerShell and VBA macros

Since their return four years ago, Office macros have been one of the most common ways to spread malware. Today, we publish a research paper which looks in detail at a campaign in which VBA macros are used to execute PowerShell code, which in turn…

VB2017 paper: Android reverse engineering tools: not the usual suspects

Within a few years, Android malware has grown from a relatively small threat to a huge problem involving more than three million new malware samples a year. Axelle Apvrille, one of the world's leading Android malware researchers, will deliver a…

Patch early, patch often, but don't blindly trust every 'patch'

Compromised websites are being used to serve fake Flash Player uploads that come with a malicious payload.

Virus Bulletin at RSA

Next week, VB Editor Martijn Grooten will be at the RSA Conference in San Francisco.