You are your own threat model

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   May 5, 2015

For most people, the biggest security threat is that of themselves doing something they shouldn't do.

Last week, Microsoft wrote about the return of macro malware where, now that macros have long been disabled by default, social engineering is used to trick the user into enabling them.

Although it was interesting to read Microsoft's perspective, this isn't news. Last year, we published a paper by Sophos researcher Gabor Szappanos on the resurgence of malicious VBA macros. Since then, macro malware has become even more prevalent; recently, it was used to download Bartalex, Dridex and Dyre onto victims' machines.

Word file with macros

Preventing macro malware from infecting your machine is really simple: don't enable macros, no matter how much a document urges you to do so.

Macro malware stands in sharp contrast to so-called 'advanced attacks' by determined threat actors, often sponsored by nation states. Many security experts, myself included, think such threats are a major concern.

Existing technologies might not be good enough to fend off such attacks, so we are commonly told (especially by those who happen to sell technology that would provide sufficient protection). Putting a natural scepticism about technology that might promise too much aside, the fact that attackers have upped their game means we should indeed reconsider whether our existing defences are sufficient.

But in criticising such defences we shouldn't forget that, for most users, the biggest risk is that of themselves doing something they shouldn't do — whether that's enabling macros or, as with the ILOVEYOU worm that started to spread 15 years ago today, opening email attachments.

All Internet users should include advanced actors in their threat models. But for most users the threat of such actors is mostly existential; for them, the biggest danger in their threat model is themselves. A lot of existing technology actually does a pretty good job of protecting these users, even if on their own they might not be fair game for the rarer, but scarier, more advanced attackers.

Posted on 05 May 2015 by Martijn Grooten

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

In memoriam: Yonathan Klijnsma

We were very sorry to learn of the passing of researcher Yonathan Klijnsma last week. Here, former VB Editor Martijn Grooten shares his memories of a talented researcher and a very kind person: this month, infosec lost a really good one.

VB2020 localhost videos available on YouTube

VB has made all VB2020 localhost presentations available on the VB YouTube channel, so you can now watch - and share - any part of the conference freely and without registration.

VB2020 presentation & paper: 2030: backcasting the potential rise and fall of cyber threat intelligence

At VB2020 localhost, threat intelligence consultant Jamie Collier used the analytical technique of backcasting to look at the rise and fall of the cyber threat intelligence industry.

VB2020 presentation: Behind the Black Mirror: simulating attacks with mock C2 servers

At VB2020 localhost, Carbon Black's Scott Knight presented an approach he and his colleagues have taken to more realistically simulate malware attacks.

VB2020 presentation & paper: Advanced Pasta Threat: mapping threat actor usage of open-source offensive security tools

At VB2020, researcher Paul Litvak revealed how he put together a comprehensive map of threat actor use of open-source offensive security tools.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.