Despite the profitability of ransomware there is a good reason why mining malware is thriving

Posted by    on   Sep 15, 2017

When, a few years ago, a friend and I were analysing a rather large botnet and we saw some network traffic indicating that it was engaged in Bitcoin mining, we felt rather disappointed: using malware to mine for cryptocurrencies is about as basic as it gets. It is the digital equivalent of breaking into someone's house, stealing all their books and furniture, and then burning them to use as fuel.

That was four years ago, but miners continue to thrive: Kaspersky researchers say they have seen 1.65 million infections involving mining software in 2017 alone, while ESET writes about how some malicious ads use JavaScript to mine cryptocurrencies in the browser.

Cryptocurrencies (or 'crypto', if you want to annoy the cryptography community) have seen huge increases in their value, but even at the current rates, why would someone use a compromised PC for mining purposes, when there are Bitcoin farms that use dedicated hardware to mine far more efficiently? Wouldn't every calculating cybercriminal switch to the far more profitable ransomware instead, preferring hundreds of dollars (even if not every victim ends up paying) over mere pennies?

The probable answer lies in the global distribution of malware. Cybercriminals have discovered that a few hundred dollars is the 'right' amount for a ransom: enough to generate them a good income, yet affordable for most users who really want their files back. But this is only true for users living in Western countries, on Western incomes. And the Western world is not where the majority of malware infections exist.

In its State of Malware Report (pdf) from the beginning of this year, Malwarebytes writes that almost two-thirds of botnet detections are in Asia or Africa, compared with barely more than ten per cent of ransomware detections.

 

malwarebytes_malware_continents.png

Source: Malwarebytes.


The first stage of a malware infection is often a 'loader', whose sole task is to download the actual payload. A number of factors are taken into consideration when determining which malware to download, and geographic location is prominent among them. Thus the same malicious spam email can lead to ransomware in one country and to Bitcoin mining malware in another, where ransomware is not likely to yield sufficient gains.

As human beings, cybercriminals often don't make fully rational decisions. But when it comes to using their botnets to mine for malware, there really is a simple explanation.

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

Didn't come to VB2017? Tell us why!

Virus Bulletin is a company - and a conference - with a mission: to further the research in and facilitate the fight against digital threats. To help us in this mission, we want to hear from those who didn't come to Madrid. What is your impression of…

Montreal will host VB2018

Last week, we announced the full details of VB2018, which will take place 3-5 October 2018 at the Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth hotel in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

VB2017 preview: Beyond lexical and PDNS (guest blog)

In a special guest blog post, VB2017 Silver sponsor Cisco Umbrella writes about a paper that researchers Dhia Mahjoub and David Rodriguez will present at the conference this Friday.

Avast to present technical details of CCleaner hack at VB2017

The recently discovered malicious CCleaner version has become one of the biggest security stories of 2017. Two researchers from Avast, the company that had recently acquired CCleaner developer Piriform, will share the results of their investigations…

VB2017 preview: Walking in your enemy's shadow: when fourth-party collection becomes attribution hell

We preview the VB2017 paper by Kaspersky Lab researchers Juan Andrés Guerrero-Saade and Costin Raiu on fourth-party collection and its implications for attack attribution.