Subtle change could see a reduction in installation of malicious Chrome extensions

Posted by   Martijn Grooten on   Jun 13, 2018

As modern browsers have become harder to attack, malware authors have found a simple way around this: by working with the browser rather than against it. More particularly, by tricking users into installing extensions they host on official browser stores, like the Google Chrome Store.

Malicious Chrome extensions have been used for various nefarious activities, from banking fraud to delivering backdoors and stealing cryptocurrencies. Google, of course, works hard to detect and block such extensions, but as is so often the case in security, it is never 100 per cent successful.

The company has now, however, made a subtle change that should make it easier for users to detect when they are installing an extension. Until now, it has been possible for websites to offer inline installation of an extension, where a pop-up appears asking the user whether they want to install the extension. Users often read such pop-ups as if they are saying "click 'OK' to continue browsing this website", and thus unwittingly agree to the installation of extensions offered by compromised or malicious sites.

inline_install_dialog.png

Google has now banned inline installation for new extensions and later this year will disable inline installation altogether. Instead, a site that wants to offer an extension will have to send users to the Chrome Store. Of course, this won't stop gullible users form being tricked into installing malicious code, but malware authors will have to work a bit harder on social engineering.

The fight against malware is rarely about being able to stop things altogether, but about making small steps that can sometimes lead to a large reduction in the number of infections. Justin Schuh, from Google Chrome's security team, promises more changes to combat malicious browser extensions.

 

 

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 paper and video: Android app deobfuscation using static-dynamic cooperation

Static analysis and dynamic analysis each have their shortcomings as methods for analysing potentially malicious files. Today, we publish a VB2018 paper by Check Point researchers Yoni Moses and Yaniv Mordekhay, in which they describe a method that…

VB2019 call for papers closes this weekend

The call for papers for VB2019 closes on 17 March, and while we've already received many great submissions, we still want more!

Registration open for VB2019 ─ book your ticket now!

Registration for VB2019, the 29th Virus Bulletin International Conference, is now open, with an early bird rate available until 1 July.

The VB2019 call for papers is about ... papers

When we are calling for papers for the Virus Bulletin conference as we are doing now, we really mean a written paper. But don't worry if you've never written a paper - we can help!

VB2018 video: Adware is just malware with a legal department - how we reverse engineered OSX/Pirrit, received legal threats, and survived

Amit Serper first analysed the OSX/Pirrit adware in 2016, highlighting some of its malware-like techniques, and soon afterwards started receiving legal threats from the company behind it. At VB2018 Amit gave a presentation in which he discussed both…

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.