Malware authors' continued use of stolen certificates isn't all bad news

Posted by   Martijn Grooten on   Jul 10, 2018

A malware campaign has been using code-signing certificates stolen from Taiwanese companies to sign its samples, ESET researcher and regular VB conference speaker Anton Cherepanov writes.

Malware signed with stolen certificates isn't a new phenomenon. Stuxnet famously used stolen certificates, also from Taiwanese companies, and in 2016 Symantec wrote about a malware campaign that used no fewer than nine stolen certificates. A year earlier, IBM's Limor Kessem looked at the phenomenon of code signing being offered as a service in the cybercrime underground.

In this particular case, two malware families were using the stolen certificates: the PLEAD backdoor (analysed by JPCERT/CC last month) and a password stealer that steals passwords from various browsers. Both malware families are linked to the BlackTech cyber espionage group that Trend Micro wrote about last year and whose activities focus particularly on Taiwan.

PLEAD_D-Link_Certificate.pngD-Link was one of the companies whose certificates was stolen. Source: ESET.

In his blog post, Cherepanov lists a number of indicators of compromise, including the serial numbers of the two affected certificates, both of which have now been revoked. This shows another, more positive side to the use of stolen certificates by malware authors: once the certificate theft has been discovered, it does help defenders find the malware more easily.

Something similar occurs with DKIM, which is used to sign emails and which plays an important role in the fight against unwanted and malicious emails. DKIM private keys can also be stolen, but doing so won't give an adversary more than a short-term advantage: once the malicious use of a DKIM key is discovered, which in the case of email often happens quickly and automatically, emails that are signed with with are actually more likely to be blocked.

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

New paper: Does malware based on Spectre exist?

It is likely that, by now, everyone in computer science has at least heard of the Spectre attack, and many excellent explanations of the attack already exist. But what is the likelihood of finding Spectre being exploited on Android smartphones?

More VB2018 partners announced

We are excited to announce several more companies that have partnered with VB2018.

Malware authors' continued use of stolen certificates isn't all bad news

A new malware campaign that uses two stolen code-signing certificates shows that such certificates continue to be popular among malware authors. But there is a positive side to malware authors' use of stolen certificates.

Save the dates: VB2019 to take place 2-4 October 2019

Though the location will remain under wraps for a few more months, we are pleased to announce the dates for VB2019, the 29th Virus Bulletin International Conference.

Necurs update reminds us that the botnet cannot be ignored

The operators of the Necurs botnet, best known for being one of the most prolific spam botnets of the past few years, have pushed out updates to its client, which provide some important lessons about why malware infections matter.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.