EICAR 2006 in a nutshell


Eddy Willems

NOXS and EICAR, Belgium
Editor: Helen Martin


Eddy Willems provides a roundup of this year's EICAR conference.

The 15th annual EICAR conference took place last month in the German town of Hamburg. Set on Hamburg's harbour front with stunning views, the Hotel Hafen Hamburg provided an ideal setting for the conference.

The event started with two professional clinics, during which Vlasti Broucek demonstrated some 'Art of data visualisation' and Elizabeth Bates and Bill Haffner explained the 'Security and privacy risks in biometric deployments'.

The clinics took place in the morning, and after lunch the conference was opened officially with a welcome address from Rainer Fahs and a keynote address given by Sarah Gordon. Sarah's address reminded me of the reason I have been coming to this conference for 15 years: security knowledge lies in the details. A panel discussion came next in the schedule. Hosted by David Perry and Sarah Gordon, the discussion, entitled 'Birds of a feather flock together', gave a nice overview of the various anti-malware groups in the industry – like CARO, AVIEN, WildList, etc.

After this, the conference split into a well-planned two-stream programme, featuring some highly accomplished presenters.

I have always found it hard to decide which session to attend in these multiple-stream conferences, and this year it was even harder than before. If you know how to split yourself in two, please share it with me! The following are some of the highlights of the sessions I attended.

Two spam papers grabbed my attention. The first, by Christopher Lueg, Jeff Huang and Michael Twidale of the Universities of Tasmania and Illinois, explained nicely where spam comes from. The second spam paper – and probably the most controversial – was written by John Aycock and Nathan Friess of the University of Calgary. During their presentation they described some new spamming techniques that have not (yet) been seen in the wild. Let's hope spammers do not start to use these techniques.

The second day started with some definitions of crimeware given by Richard Ford (Florida Inst. Technology) and Sarah Gordon (Symantec) and spyware given by Jason Bruce (Sophos) and Martin Overton (IBM). Larry Bridwell (iCSA Labs) and Josh Harriman (Symantec) showed us some problems relating to spyware testing. Tony Lee and Jigar Mody of Microsoft proposed a behaviour-based automated classification method based on distance measure and machine learning.

A controversial paper by Eric Filiol (Army Signal Academy), entitled 'Malware pattern scanning schemes against black box analysis', was rather too theoretical for me, but it proved interesting for the more mathematically-minded delegates.

More practical and accessible to all delegates were the papers 'Enlisting the end-user', given by Jeannette Jarvis (Boeing); 'Pharming: a real threat?', given by David Sancho and François Maillard (Trend Micro); 'Unpacking – a hybrid approach', given by Vanja Svajcer and Samir Mody (Sophos) and 'Evolution from a Honeypot to a distributed honey net', given by Oliver Auerbach (Avira).

This year's gala dinner was unusual in that, for the first time in four years, there wasn't a new virus outbreak to talk about. There seemed to be a trend emerging, with the release of Sober.P on the first day of last year's EICAR conference, the appearance of Sasser during the 2004 conference and Bugbear.B during the 2003 conference – but thankfully this year's event was virus free.

The third day of the conference is dedicated to non-academic papers – which tend to be more commercially oriented. Nevertheless, the final day started with one of the most interesting keynote speeches I have heard for a long time: Professor Klaus Brunnstein (University of Hamburg) with 'Inherent technical risks will lead information and knowledge societies into a risk society'.

Most people assume that everything ends after the three official conference days – but not so. In what we call a post-conference programme, two task forces (Awareness and Content Security) meet to discuss and agree on real practical goals and objectives. Our RFID task force has already provided guidelines for implementing RFID technology.

The EICAR 2006 agenda was interesting and varied, and the papers were the best I have seen at an EICAR conference so far. Planning has already begun for the 2007 conference and details will be announced shortly at http://www.eicar.org/. The organizers are looking at Budapest and Barcelona as possible locations – but of course other suggestions are always welcome.

As one of the founding members of EICAR, I remember the first constitutional EICAR conference in Brussels in 1991. A lot has happened, changed and improved during those 15 years. And I fully expect this to continue over the next 15 years.



Latest articles:

VB2018 paper: Office bugs on the rise

It has never been easier to attack Office vulnerabilities than it is nowadays. In this paper Gabor Szappanos looks more deeply into the dramatic changes that have happened in the past 12 months in the Office exploit scene.

VB2018 paper: Tracking Mirai variants

Mirai, the infamous DDoS botnet family known for its great destructive power, was made open source soon after being found by MalwareMustDie in August 2016, which led to a proliferation of Mirai variant botnets. This paper presents a set of Mirai…

VB2018 paper: Hide’n’Seek: an adaptive peer-to-peer IoT botnet

This paper presents a thorough analysis of the inner workings of Hide’n’Seek, a peer-to-peer IoT botnet discovered in January 2018. With an exploit table that can be updated in memory and modular in its approach, Hide’n’Seek gives us a glimpse of…

Botception: botnet distributes script with bot capabilities

Researchers Jan Sirmer and Adolf Streda describe the branch of the Necurs botnet that they have been monitoring, the changes it has undergone in the course of a year, and present an analysis of the next stage of the attack: Flawed Ammy.

VB2018 paper: Since the hacking of Sony Pictures

Minseok (Jacky) Cha describes various attacks in Korea which occurred after the Sony Pictures hacking incident and which are suspected to be the work of the same group, the Lazarus Group.

Bulletin Archive

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.