VB100 certification report - February 2019

Martijn Grooten

Virus Bulletin

Copyright © 2019 Virus Bulletin


 

Introduction

Anti-malware products don't have an easy job these days. There are millions of malware samples – which tend to be written with the explicit goal of bypassing anti-malware products – to be detected and blocked, while at the same time there are millions of legitimate programs – which occasionally use some of the same techniques as malware – that mustn't be blocked. On top of that, there are dozens of competing products on the market.

Users are right to expect anti-malware products to satisfy a minimum standard of blocking malicious executables that have recently been seen in the wild, while blocking few to no legitimate programs.

For more than two decades, Virus Bulletin has set a minimum standard for anti-virus (or anti-malware) products, checking whether products live up to expectation and providing those that do with the VB100 'stamp of approval'.

This report details the performance of 30 such products from 28 different vendors during January and February 2019.

 

The VB100 set-up

In the VB100 test, a copy of the product to be tested is installed on two platforms: Windows 10 and Windows 7. On each platform, and at three different times in the test, the product is asked to scan both the latest version of the WildList1 and a selection of clean files taken from Virus Bulletin's own set of files belonging to widely used legitimate software.

A legitimate file that is blocked at least once is considered a false positive, while a WildList file that isn't blocked is considered a miss.

A product achieves a VB100 certification if:

  • No more than 0.5% of WildList samples are missed

and

  • No more than 0.01% of legitimate files are blocked

For full details, we refer to the VB100 methodology on the Virus Bulletin website: https://www.virusbulletin.com/testing/vb100/vb100-methodology/vb100-methodology-ver1-1/. This test used version 1.1 of the VB100 methodology.

 

Diversity test

The malware part of the VB100 certification uses the WildList, a regularly updated list of extremely well-vetted malware samples, guaranteed to have been spotted in the wild multiple times. This makes them very suitable for a certification test like VB100.

The 'Diversity Test' looks at products' detection of another set of recent malware samples, to acknowledge the fact that products detect malware samples beyond a standard set of samples, and provides a measure of that detection.

 

Products & results

Products were allowed to download updates during the course of the test. The version numbers listed in the results that follows refer to those at the start of the test.

 

Adaware Antivirus Free

Windows 7 version 12.6.997.11652  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 12.6.997.11652 
WildList detection 100.0% 
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 97.44%

 

Adaware Antivirus Pro

Windows 7 version 12.6.997.11652  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 12.6.997.11652 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 97.44%

 

AhnLab V3 Internet Security 9.0

Windows 7 version 9.0.52.5  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 9.0.52.5 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Arcabit AntiVirus

Windows 7 version 2019.01.14  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 2019.01.10 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Avast Free Antivirus

Windows 7 version 19.1.2360  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 19.1.2360 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

AVG Internet Security

Windows 7 version 19.1.3075  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 19.1.3075 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Cynet 360

Windows 7 version 8.3.52.190  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 8.3.52.190 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Cyren Command Anti-Malware

Windows 7 version 5.2.1  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 5.2.1 
WildList detection 99.6%
False positive rate 0.002%
Diversity test rate 99.59%

 

Defenx Security Suite

Windows 7 version 15.1.0112  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 15.1.0112 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Emsisoft Anti-Malware

Windows 7 version 2018.12.1.9144  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 2018.12.1.9144 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

eScan Internet Security Suite for Windows

Windows 7 version 14.0.1400.2029  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 14.0.1400.2029 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

ESET Internet Security

Windows 7 version 12.0.31.0  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 12.0.31.0 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

ESTsecurity ALYac

Windows 7 version 3.0.1.3.31873  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 3.0.1.3.31873 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Exosphere Endpoint Protection

Windows 7 version V18121900  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version V19012400 
WildList detection 99.9%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Faronics Anti-Virus

Windows 7 version 4.12.3102.401  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 4.12.3102.401 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.008%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

FireEye Endpoint Security

Windows 7 version 27.31.0.0  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 27.31.0.0 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Fortinet FortiClient

Windows 7 version 5.6.2.1117  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 5.6.2.1117 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

G DATA Antivirus

Windows 7 version 25.5.0.2  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 25.5.0.4 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 99.90%

 

IKARUS anti.virus

Windows 7 version 2.19.14  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 2.19.14 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.002%
Diversity test rate 99.08%

 

K7 Total Security

Windows 7 version 15.1.0350  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 15.1.0350 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security 10 for Windows

Windows 7 version 11.0.0.6499  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 11.0.0.6499 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 99.69%

 

Rising Security Cloud Client

Windows 7 version 3.0.0.85  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 3.0.0.85 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.003%
Diversity test rate 91.61%

 

TACHYON Endpoint Security

Windows 7 version 5.0.0.57  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 5.0.0.57 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.007%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

TeamViewer Endpoint Protection

Windows 7 version 1.0.105328  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 1.0.129712 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Tencent PC Manager

Windows 7 version 12.3.26600.901  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 12.3.26597.901 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Total Defense Premium

Windows 7 version 9.0.0.747  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 9.0.0.747 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Total Defense Unlimited V11

Windows 7 version 11.0.0.775  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 11.0.0.775 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

VIPRE Advanced Security

Windows 7 version 11.0.3.20  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 11.0.3.20 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

VirIT eXplorer PRO

Windows 7 version 8.8.44  02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 8.8.42 
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 81.68%

 

Wontok SafeCentral Security Suite

Windows 7 version 2.0.1548 02-19.jpg
Windows 10 version 2.0.1548
WildList detection 100.0%
False positive rate 0.000%
Diversity test rate 100.00%

 

Appendix 1: products not certified

All tested products were certified.

 

Appendix 2: excluded parts

Technical and other issues can render the data we collect insufficient or otherwise unsuitable for accurate reporting. In such cases, the methodology allows us to discard the affected test part and record the event below. Two healthy test parts out of three are required for the certification to be issued.

  • For Adaware Antivirus Free and Adaware Antivirus Pro, the results of the diversity test on Windows 7 were discarded due to technical issues.
  • For TeamViewer Endpoint Protection, the results of the diversity test on Windows 10 were discarded due to technical issues.
  • For Rising Security Cloud Client, the results of the first part of the certification test were discarded due to technical issues.

 

Appendix 3: sample set sizes

The WildList contained 2,908 samples. The set of clean files used for the false positive test contained 99,996 files, of which 29,217 were portable executable (PE) files. The set used for the Diversity Test contained 977 samples.

 

Footnote

1 The WildList is an extremely well-vetted set of malware recently observed in the wild by researchers: http://www.wildlist.org/.

Download PDF

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest reviews:

VBSpam comparative review

The Q1 2024 VBSpam test measured the performance of nine full email security solutions, one custom configured solution and one open‑source solution.

VBSpam comparative review

The Q4 2023 VBSpam test measured the performance of eight full email security solutions, one custom configured solution, one open-source solution and one blocklist.

VBSpam comparative review

In the Q3 2023 VBSpam test we measured the performance of eight full email security solutions, one custom configured solution, one open-source solution and one blocklist.

VBSpam comparative review

In the Q2 2023 VBSpam test we measured the performance of nine full email security solutions, one custom configured solution, one open-source solution and one blocklist.

VBSpam comparative review

In the Q1 2023 VBSpam test we measured the performance of eight full email security solutions, one custom configured solution, one open-source solution and one blocklist.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.