VBSpam Email Security Comparative Review March 2020

Ionuţ Răileanu

Virus Bulletin

Copyright © 2020 Virus Bulletin


 

Introduction

In this test – which forms part of Virus Bulletin’s continuously running security product test suite – 11 full email security solutions and four blacklists of various kinds were assembled on the test bench to measure their performance against various streams of wanted, unwanted and malicious emails.

The news in these test reports tends to be good: email security products are an important first line of defence against the many email-borne threats and, especially against the bulk of opportunistic threats, they perform really well. The news in this report is no exception, with 10 full solutions obtaining a VBSpam award and seven of them performing well enough to earn a VBSpam+ award.

However, it is important to look beyond the spam catch rates: block rates of malware and phishing emails, though still high, were significantly lower than the block rates of ordinary spam emails.

 

Malware and phishing

In this test we continue to highlight the email security solutions’ performance on malware and phishing emails. In these two categories we consider emails with a malicious attachment or containing links that either lead to a site with a fake login page (traditional phishing) or that download malware. Also considered as phishing are those emails with an HTML or PDF attachment that doesn’t display malicious behaviour itself, but which contains links that lead to a phishing site.

We have seen an increase in spam emails sent from legitimate web pages through open forms. One such campaign caught our attention since it was missed by many of the products in the test. The emails are sent from UPS and contain a suspicious URL in the text of the email in place of the name of the recipient.

Fig1-VBSpam-March2020.pngSpam campaign in which emails are sent from UPS and contain a suspicious URL in the text of the email in place of the name of the recipient.

 

Results

Spam catch rates continued to be high with many products blocking 99.9% or more of the spam, but the catch rates on malware and phishing were significantly lower. Ten of the participating full solutions achieved a VBSpam award, with the products of seven vendors – Axway, Bitdefender, ESET, Fortinet, IBM, Safemail and ZEROSPAM – performing well enough to achieve a VBSpam+ award.

Bitdefender, ESET, FortiMail, Libraesva and Safemail didn’t miss a single email with a malicious attachment. Only ESET and ZEROSPAM achieved a perfect score in the phishing category, while Libraesva missed just one phishing email.

 

Abusix Mail Intelligence rspamd

SC rate: 99.59%
FP rate: 0.45%
Final score: 97.22
Malware catch rate: 97.33%
Phishing catch rate: 87.06%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.17%
Abusix SC rate: 99.83%
Newsletters FP rate: 3.7%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

 

Axway MailGate 5.6

SC rate: 99.72%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.70
Malware catch rate: 94.33%
Phishing catch rate: 90.91%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.80%
Abusix SC rate: 99.71%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.5%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-plus-0320.jpg

 

Bitdefender Security for Mail Servers 3.1.7

SC rate: 99.98%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.98
Malware catch rate: 100.00%
Phishing catch rate: 98.77%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.995%
Abusix SC rate: 99.98%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-plus-0320.jpg

 

ESET Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange Server

SC rate: 99.98%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.98
Malware catch rate: 100.00%
Phishing catch rate: 100.00%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 100.00%
Abusix SC rate: 99.98%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-plus-0320.jpg

 

Fortinet FortiMail

SC rate: 99.97%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.97
Malware catch rate: 100.00%
Phishing catch rate: 98.15%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.99%
Abusix SC rate: 99.96%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-plus-0320.jpg

 

IBM Lotus Protector for Mail Security

SC rate: 99.88%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.88
Malware catch rate: 99.67%
Phishing catch rate: 98.00%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.94%
Abusix SC rate: 99.87%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-plus-0320.jpg

 

Libraesva ESG v.4.7

SC rate: 99.95%
FP rate: 0.02%
Final score: 99.85
Malware catch rate: 100.00%
Phishing catch rate: 99.85%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.99%
Abusix SC rate: 99.94%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-verified-0320.jpg

 

Safemail

SC rate: 99.93%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.89
Malware catch rate: 100.00%
Phishing catch rate: 99.08%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.97%
Abusix SC rate: 99.93%
Newsletters FP rate: 1.1%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-plus-0320.jpg

 

Spamhaus Data Query Service

SC rate: 99.42%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.40
Malware catch rate: 85.50%
Phishing catch rate: 86.29%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.67%
Abusix SC rate: 99.35%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.5%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-verified-0320.jpg

 

Spamhaus rsync

SC rate: 98.78%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 98.78
Malware catch rate: 83.67%
Phishing catch rate: 79.51%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 98.99%
Abusix SC rate: 98.74%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-verified-0320.jpg

 

ZEROSPAM

SC rate: 99.85%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.75
Malware catch rate: 99.83%
Phishing catch rate: 100.00%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.98%
Abusix SC rate: 99.82%
Newsletters FP rate: 2.6%
Speed:

10% GREEN 50% GREEN 95% GREEN 98% GREEN

vbspam-plus-0320.jpg

 

Abusix Mail Intelligence

SC rate: 99.21%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 99.21
Malware catch rate: 92.00%
Phishing catch rate: 83.98%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 97.99%
Abusix SC rate: 99.80%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%

 

IBM X-Force Combined

SC rate: 95.52%
FP rate: 0.02%
Final score: 95.42
Malware catch rate: 83.50%
Phishing catch rate: 84.75%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 99.57%
Abusix SC rate: 93.79%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%

 

IBM X-Force IP

SC rate: 94.73%
FP rate: 0.02%
Final score: 94.63
Malware catch rate: 83.00%
Phishing catch rate: 80.28%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 98.62%
Abusix SC rate: 93.07%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%

 

IBM X-Force URL

SC rate: 65.58%
FP rate: 0.00%
Final score: 65.58
Malware catch rate: 8.83%
Phishing catch rate: 27.27%
Project Honey Pot SC rate: 93.88%
Abusix SC rate: 53.27%
Newsletters FP rate: 0.0%

 

Results tables

  True negatives False positives FP rate False negatives True positives SC rate Final score VBSpam
AMI rspamd 4864 22 0.45% 569 152541 99.59% 97.22  
Axway 4898 0 0.00% 398.4 152711.6 99.72% 99.70 vbantispam-plus.gif
Bitdefender 4898 0 0.00% 25.4 153084.6 99.98% 99.98 vbantispam-plus.gif
ESET 4898 0 0.00% 19.8 153090.2 99.98% 99.98 vbantispam-plus.gif
FortiMail 4898 0 0.00% 42.8 153067.2 99.97% 99.97 vbantispam-plus.gif
IBM 4898 0 0.00% 168.6 152941.4 99.88% 99.88 vbantispam-plus.gif
Libraesva 4897 1 0.02% 64 153046 99.95% 99.85 vbantispam-pass.gif
Safemail 4898 0 0.00% 86.8 153023.2 99.93% 99.89 vbantispam-plus.gif
Spamhaus DQS 4898 0 0.00% 848.4 152261.6 99.42% 99.40 vbantispam-pass.gif
Spamhaus rsync 4898 0 0.00% 1815 151295 98.78% 98.78 vbantispam-pass.gif
ZEROSPAM 4898 0 0.00% 196.6 152903.4 99.85% 99.75 vbantispam-plus.gif
AMI* 4898 0 0.00% 1147.2 151962.8 99.21% 99.21 N/A
IBM X-Force Combined* 4897 1 0.02% 6823.2 146286.8 95.52% 95.42 N/A
IBM X-Force IP* 4897 1 0.02% 8028.8 145081.2 94.73% 94.63 N/A
IBM X-Force URL* 4898 0 0.00% 52678 100432 65.58% 65.58 N/A

*These products are partial solutions and their performance should not be compared with that of other products.
(Please refer to the text for full product names and details.)

 

  Newsletters Malware Phishing Project Honey Pot Abusix STDev†
  False positives FP rate False negatives SC rate False negatives SC rate False negatives SC rate False negatives SC rate
AMI rspamd 7 3.68% 16 97.33% 84 87.06% 384.4 99.17% 184.6 99.83% 0.54
Axway 1 0.53% 34 94.33% 59 90.91% 93.6 99.80% 304.8 99.71% 0.5
Bitdefender 0 0.00% 0 100.00% 8 98.77% 2 99.995% 23.4 99.98% 0.16
ESET 0 0.00% 0 100.00% 0 100.00% 0 100.00% 19.8 99.98%  0.16
FortiMail  0 0.00% 0 100.00% 12 98.15%  2.4 99.99%  40.4 99.96%  0.11
IBM 0 0.00% 2 99.67%  13 98.00%  26.2 99.94%  142.4  99.87%  0.3
Libraesva  0 0.00% 0 100.00% 1 99.85%  2.6 99.99%  61.4 99.94%  0.15
Safemail 2 1.05%  0 100.00% 6 99.08%  12.2 99.97%  74.6 99.93%  0.18
Spamhaus DQS  1 0.53%  87 85.50%  89 86.29%  153.4 99.67%  695 99.35%  0.7
Spamhaus rsync  0 0.00% 98 83.67%  133 79.51%  469 98.99%  1346 98.74%  1.07
ZEROSPAM 5 2.63%  1 99.83%  0 100.00% 7.2 99.98%  189.4 99.82%  0.35
AMI*  0 0.00% 48 92.00%  104 83.98%  935.8 97.99%  211.4 99.80%  0.71
IBM X-Force Combined*  0 0.00% 99 83.50%  99 84.75%  202 99.57%  6621.2 93.79%  3.34
IBM X-Force IP  0 0.00% 102 83.00%  128 80.28%  640.4 98.62%  7388.4 93.07%  3.47
IBM X-Force URL*  0 0.00% 547 8.83%  472 27.27%  2846 93.88%  49832  53.27%  24.36

*These products are partial solutions and their performance should not be compared with that of other products. None of the queries to the IP blacklists included any information on the attachments; hence their performance on the malware corpus is added purely for information.
† The standard deviation of a product is calculated using the set of its hourly spam catch rates.
(Please refer to the text for full product names and details.)
 

 

  Speed
  10% 50% 95% 98%
AMI rspamd speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
Axway speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
Bitdefender speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
ESET speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
FortiMail speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
IBM speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
Libraesva speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
Safemail speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
Spamhaus DQS speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
Spamhaus rsync speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg
ZEROSPAM speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg

(Please refer to the text for full product names and details.)

speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg 0-30 seconds speed-colour-blobs-YELLOW.jpg 30 seconds to two minutes speed-colour-blobs-ORANGE.jpg two minutes to 10 minutes speed-colour-blobs-RED.jpg more than 10 minutes

 

Products ranked by final score
ESET 99.98
Bitdefender 99.98
FortiMail 99.97
Safemail 99.89
IBM 99.88
Libraesva 99.85
ZEROSPAM 99.75
Axway 99.70
Spamhaus DQS 99.40
Spamhaus rsync 98.78
AMI rspamd 97.22

(Please refer to the text for full product names and details.) 

 

Hosted solutions Anti-malware IPv6 DKIM SPF DMARC Multiple MX-records Multiple locations
Safemail ClamAV; proprietary
ZEROSPAM ClamAV  

(Please refer to the text for full product names and details.)

 

Local solutions Anti-malware IPv6 DKIM SPF DMARC Interface
CLI GUI Web GUI API
Axway Kaspersky, McAfee        
Bitdefender Bitdefender        
ESET ESET Threatsense    
FortiMail Fortinet  
IBM Sophos; IBM Remote Malware Detection          
Libraesva ClamAV; others optional        
Spamhaus DQS Optional        
Spamhaus rsync Optional        

(Please refer to the text for full product names and details.)

 

VBSpam-quadrant-March2020.jpg (Please refer to the text for full product names and details.)

 

Appendix: set-up, methodology and email corpora

The full VBSpam test methodology can be found at https://www.virusbulletin.com/testing/vbspam/vbspam-methodology/vbspam-methodology-ver20.

The test ran for 16 days, from 12am on 8 February to 12am on 24 February 2020 with a few hours of downtime from 9 February 19:00 to 10 February 08:00 GMT, caused by some issues in our network.

The test corpus consisted of 158,322 emails. 153,234 of these were spam, 46,542 of which were provided by Project Honey Pot, with the remaining 106,692 spam emails provided by Abusix. There were 4,898 legitimate emails (‘ham’) and 190 newsletters, a category that includes various kinds of commercial and non-commercial opt-in mailings.

155 emails in the spam corpus were considered ‘unwanted’ (see the June 2018 report1) and were included with a weight of 0.2; this explains the non-integer numbers in some of the tables.

Moreover, 600 emails from the spam corpus were found to contain a malicious attachment while 649 contained a link to a phishing or malware site; though we report separate performance metrics on these corpora, it should be noted that these emails were also counted as part of the spam corpus.

Emails were sent to the products in real time and in parallel. Though products received the email from a fixed IP address, all products had been set up to read the original sender’s IP address as well as the EHLO/HELO domain sent during the SMTP transaction, either from the email headers or through an optional XCLIENT SMTP command2.

For those products running in our lab, we all ran them as virtual machines on a VMware ESXi cluster. As different products have different hardware requirements – not to mention those running on their own hardware, or those running in the cloud – there is little point comparing the memory, processing power or hardware the products were provided with; we followed the developers’ requirements and note that the amount of email we receive is representative of that received by a small organization.

Although we stress that different customers have different needs and priorities, and thus different preferences when it comes to the ideal ratio of false positives to false negatives, we created a one-dimensional 'final score' to compare products. This is defined as the spam catch (SC) rate minus five times the weighted false positive (WFP) rate. The WFP rate is defined as the false positive rate of the ham and newsletter corpora taken together, with emails from the latter corpus having a weight of 0.2:

WFP rate = (#false positives + 0.2 * min(#newsletter false positives , 0.2 * #newsletters)) / (#ham + 0.2 * #newsletters)

while in the spam catch rate (SC), emails considered ‘unwanted’ (see above) are included with a weight of 0.2.

The final score is then defined as:

Final score = SC - (5 x WFP)

In addition, for each product, we measure how long it takes to deliver emails from the ham corpus (excluding false positives) and, after ordering these emails by this time, we colour-code the emails at the 10th, 50th, 95th and 98th percentiles:

speed-colour-blobs-GREEN.jpg (green) = up to 30 seconds
YELLOW (yellow) = 30 seconds to two minutes
speed-colour-blobs-ORANGE.jpg (orange) = two to ten minutes
speed-colour-blobs-RED.jpg (red) = more than ten minutes

 

Products earn VBSpam certification if the value of the final score is at least 98 and the ‘delivery speed colours’ at 10 and 50 per cent are green or yellow and that at 95 per cent is green, yellow or orange.

Meanwhile, products that combine a spam catch rate of 99.5% or higher with a lack of false positives, no more than 2.5% false positives among the newsletters and ‘delivery speed colours’ of green at 10 and 50 per cent and green or yellow at 95 and 98 per cent earn a VBSpam+ award.

 

Footnotes

1 https://www.virusbulletin.com/virusbulletin/2018/06/vbspam-comparative-review.

2 http://www.postfix.org/XCLIENT_README.html

Download PDF

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest reviews:

VB100 Certification Report - April 2020

This report details the VB100 certification results of 42 anti-malware products from 36 different vendors during March and April 2020.

VBWeb Comparative Review - Spring 2020

In the final VBWeb test we measure the performance of three web security products against a wide range of live web threats, including phishing threats. This report also includes an overview of the Spring 2020 threat landscape.

VBSpam Comparative Review - March 2020

In the March 2020 VBSpam test 10 of the 11 participating full solutions obtained a VBSpam award and seven of them performed well enough to earn a VBSpam+ award.

VB100 Certification Report - February 2020

This report details the VB100 certification results of 40 anti-malware products from 36 different vendors during January and February 2020.

VBWeb Comparative Review - Winter 2020

The VBWeb tests measure the performance of web security products against a wide range of live web threats, also including phishing threats. This report also includes an overview of the Winter 2019/2020 threat landscape.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.