News summary...

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Jan 16, 2003

Trend estimates $5b virus damage in 2003, monoculture blues, Symantec 'reels from week of mishaps', more MiMail, and more...

Trend Micro kicks off today's news summary with an estimate that computer viruses caused $55 billion of damage in 2003, and a prediction that 'the spam threat will increase exponentially, and [spam] will become the hideouts for viruses and hacking programs trying to gain an entry into the network.'

Trend is not the only AV company to be pushing its anti-spam products - The Star's TechCentral quotes Charles Cousins, managing director of Sophos Southeast Asia, as saying that it's not worth 'deploying free spam filtering software you find on the Internet ... spam writers use [it] to carry out quality control on their efforts.' This will no doubt upset both MessageLabs and Network Associates whose products are based on the free (as in beer and speech) and widely-acclaimed SpamAssassin.

CNet has a meandering article entitled 'Agriculture epidemics may hold clues to Net viruses', which addresses the role of monoculture in the computing industry, arguing that monoculture in the computing industry leads to the same problems it does in agriculture. Not only has this topic has been pretty well covered ( heise.de, New Scientist, Salon ) elsewhere but the results of a scientific investigation of monoculture carried out by Richard Ford (FIT), and published in the December 2003 issue of Virus Bulletin cast some serious doubt on operating system diversity as a legitimate solution to the problem of malicious mobile code.

Meanwhile, we are told that Security [is] a work in progress for Microsoft - perhaps that's why Microsoft is partnering with NAI to promote 'Personal Firewall Day'.

ARNnet reports that 'Symantec [is reeling] from [a] week of mishaps' after encountering problems with VeriSign certificates and a more recent vulnerability in its LiveUpdate tool. The same article suggests that Symantec may be more than a little unhappy with the amount of media coverage they've received over this, especially considering that there has been more finger pointing over a vulnerability in the bzip2 scanning of Kaspersky, Trend and NAI - but this has gone largely unreported in mainstream media.

Truth News has an interesting article about the possibility of laws that would require consumers to install 'Internet Security' applications, since distributed denial of service attacks could become/are a threat to national security.

Finally at the end of this week, there are reports of a new MiMail variant on the loose - and, according to Kaspersky, more to come.

Posted on 16 January 2003 by Virus Bulletin

 Tags

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2019 paper: APT cases exploiting vulnerabilities in region-specific software

At VB2019, JPCERT/CC's Shusei Tomonaga and Tomoaki Tani presented a paper on attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in software used only in Japan, using malware that is unique to Japan. Today we publish both their paper and the recording of their…

New paper: Detection of vulnerabilities in web applications by validating parameter integrity and data flow graphs

In a follow-up to a paper presented at VB2019, Prismo Systems researchers Abhishek Singh and Ramesh Mani detail algorithms that can be used to detect SQL injection in stored procedures, persistent cross-site scripting (XSS), and server‑side request…

VB2020 programme announced

VB is pleased to reveal the details of an interesting and diverse programme for VB2020, the 30th Virus Bulletin International Conference.

VB2019 paper: Cyber espionage in the Middle East: unravelling OSX.WindTail

At VB2019 in London, Jamf's Patrick Wardle analysed the WindTail macOS malware used by the WindShift APT group, active in the Middle East. Today we publish both Patrick's paper and the recording of his presentation.

VB2019 paper: 2,000 reactions to a malware attack – accidental study

At VB2019 cybercrime journalist and researcher Adam Haertlé presented an analysis of almost 2000 unsolicited responses sent by victims of a malicious email campaign. Today we publish both his paper and the recording of his presentation.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.