Lighter sentences for virus writers?

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Mar 3, 2003

A US report claims that sentences for computer-related crimes are too harsh.

The USA's largest group of defence lawyers has backed a report claiming that sentences for computer-related crimes are too harsh.

In a set of comments submitted to the US Sentencing Commission and signed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Sentencing Project (a group that focuses on perceived injustices in penalties), sentences that have been awarded for computer-related crimes were criticised for being tougher than those for comparable, non-computer-related crimes.

According to the report the 'typical' computer crime involves the misuse of a company's computers by a disgruntled current or former employee and the severity of sentencing often exceeds that of the crime.

The author of the report believes that the serious nature of computer-related offences is often overplayed, with the calculation of loss being both unreliable and open to exaggeration.

The report argues that the loss estimation for identical offences can vary widely depending on factors such as the actions taken by the victim (e.g. one victim may simply restore the hard drive from backup, while another spends large amounts of money hiring consultants to assess the damage) and the nature of the victim (i.e. the losses resulting from a compromised system within a small business with a low turnover will be lower than those resulting from a similar attack on a thriving business).

Furthermore, the report argues that 'greater penalties are dangerous' and they 'may chill legitimate computer research, business development and reporting on security vulnerabilities.' The author imagines that, were greater penalties to be instituted, security researchers who uncover and disseminate information on vulnerabilities might refrain from doing so for fear of being charged for their actions.

Last year, the sentencing by US courts of Melissa author David Smith provoked considerable discussion within the anti-virus community. Some considered Smith's 20-month prison sentence a fitting penalty for what they, like the authors of the paper, felt amounted to little more than a 'white collar crime', while others were disappointed by the lenience of the sentence. There was little talk, however, of the sentence being too harsh.

In his comment on David Smith's sentencing (see VB, June 2002, p.2) AV researcher James Wolfe said, 'it is nice to see that [US] courts have set a precedent for convicting virus writers.'

Let's hope the United States Sentencing Commission doesn't undermine that good work when it reviews and amends the sentencing guidelines for computer-related crimes.

Meanwhile, Reuters reports that new laws approved by European Union justice ministers will mean that, in Europe, virus writers could be imprisoned for up to five years. According to Reuters: 'Hacking and spreading viruses, when committed by organized criminals, will be punished with jail terms of no less than two years - and up to five years - under the new law.'

Posted on 03 March 2003 by Virus Bulletin

 Tags

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

Red Eyes threat group targets North Korean defectors

A research paper by AhnLab researcher Minseok Cha looks at the activities of the Red Eyes threat group (also known as Group 123 and APT 37), whose targets include North Korean defectors, as well as journalists and human rights defenders focused on…

VB announces Threat Intelligence Summit to take place during VB2018

We are very excited to announce a special summit, as part of VB2018, that will be dedicated to all aspects of threat intelligence.

VB2018 Small Talk: An industry approach for unwanted software criteria and clean requirements

An industry approach for defining and detecting unwanted software to be presented and discussed at the Virus Bulletin conference.

VB2018 call for last-minute papers opened

The call for last-minute papers for VB2018 is now open. Submit before 2 September to have your abstract considered for one of the nine slots reserved for 'hot' research.

VB2017 paper and update: Browser attack points still abused by banking trojans

At VB2017, ESET researchers Peter Kálnai and Michal Poslušný looked at how banking malware interacts with browsers. Today we publish their paper, share the video of their presentation, and also publish a guest blog post from Peter, in which he…

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.