VB2014 paper: Apple without a shell - iOS under targeted attack

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Nov 10, 2014

Developer Enterprise Program recently found to be used by WireLurker.

Over the next few months, we will be sharing VB2014 conference papers as well as video recordings of the presentations. Today, we have added 'Apple without a shell - iOS under targeted attack', by FireEye researchers Tao Wei, Min Zheng, Hui Xue and Dawn Song.

Considering its large user base, and given that malware targeting non-jailbroken devices can still be counted on the fingers of one hand, iOS is one of the most secure operating systems there is. Yet that doesn't mean there are no attack vectors.

In a paper presented by Tao Wei and Hui Xue at VB2014 in Seattle, the FireEye researchers look at an interesting vector that could be used to target iOS apps: the iOS Developer Enterprise Program.

This program allows companies to sign and distribute in-house apps that bypass Apple's famously strict review process. In particular, such apps are able to use private, undocumented APIs.

Not only are these undocumented APIs more powerful because they are not intended to be available to app developers, they are also not always designed with security in mind. Indeed, the researchers found a number of vulnerabilities, for instance one (CVE-2014-1276) that could be used to monitor a user's input - something that an attacker would certainly be interested in.

To obtain a certificate for the Developer Enterprise Program, all that is needed is $299 and a valid company - neither of which are beyond the means of an average attacker. Indeed, we saw last week how the 'WireLurker' attackers did just that.

This particular campaign also showed that Apple can and does revoke abused certificates, but in their paper, the researchers point out that an attacker could even block OSCP, the protocol that checks for revoked certificates, thus making the malicious app survive beyond the revocation.

You can read the paper here in HTML-format, or download it here as a PDF (no registration or subscription required). You can download the presentation slides here.



Posted on 10 November 2014 by Martijn Grooten

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 paper: From Hacking Team to hacked team to…?

Today we publish the VB2018 paper and video by ESET researcher Filip Kafka, who looked at the new malware by Hacking Team, after the company had recovered from the 2015 breach.

The spam that is hardest to block is often the most damaging

We see a lot of spam in the VBSpam test lab, and we also see how well such emails are being blocked by email security products. Worryingly, it is often the emails with a malicious attachment or a phishing link that are most likely to be missed.

Throwback Thursday: We're all doomed

Mydoom turns 15 this month, and is still being seen in email attachments. This Throwback Thursday we look back to March 2004, when Gabor Szappanos tracked the rise of W32/Mydoom.

VB2019 call for papers - now open!

Have you analysed a new online threat? Do you know a new way to defend against such threats? Are you tasked with securing systems and fending off attacks? The call for papers for VB2019 is now open and we want to hear from you!

VB2018 paper: Unpacking the packed unpacker: reversing an Android anti-analysis library

Today, we publish a VB2018 paper by Google researcher Maddie Stone in which she looks at one of the most interesting anti-analysis native libraries in the Android ecosystem. We also release the recording of Maddie's presentation.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.