WireLurker malware infects iOS devices through OS X

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Nov 6, 2014

Non-jailbroken devices infected via enterprise provisioning program.

Researchers at Palo Alto Networks have published a research paper (PDF) analysing the 'WireLurker' malware that runs on Mac OS X, and which is then used to further infect iOS devices connected to an infected machine.

WireLurker is found to have infected 467 apps on the Maiyadi App Store, a third-party store based in China. Infected apps have been downloaded more than 350,000 times.

Maiyadi App Store

Malware targeting OS X has become increasingly common, no doubt helped by the various ways in which malware can maintain persistence, as described in Patrick Wardle's VB2014 paper that we published last week. In the case of WireLurker, it uses launch daemons to install persistently on an infected system.

However, OS X isn't the malware's only target. As its name suggests, WireLurker waits for iOS devices to be connected to an infected system. It then sends information about the connected device to a command and control server. It also tries to install trojanised versions of common apps onto the device.

Interestingly, it even tries to do so when the device isn't jailbroken, by making use of the iOS Developer Enterprise Program. Another VB2014 paper, by FireEye researcher Tao Wei and his colleagues, explained how this program could be used by malware authors to bypass Apple's review process. (A blog post previewing this paper can be found here; we plan to publish the paper here soon.)

WireLurker seems mostly concerned with collecting information from both iOS and OS X systems, but the researchers are unsure about its ultimate goal. However, security expert Jonathan Zdziarski may have a point when he writes 'WireLurker may be trying to uncover the identities of Chinese software pirates'.

I also agree with Zdziarski's opinion that WireLurker is notable mainly because it uses a number of techniques not previously seen in the wild, not because it is particularly advanced. A more sophisticated attacker could easily use these same techniques in a far more effective and dangerous way.

Posted on 06 November 2014 by Martijn Grooten



Latest posts:

Five reasons to submit a VB2018 paper this weekend

The call for papers for VB2018 closes on 18 March, and while we've already received many great submissions, we still want more! Here are five reasons why you should submit a paper this weekend.

First partners of VB2018 announced

We are excited to announce the first six companies to partner with VB2018.

VB2018: looking for technical and non-technical talks

We like to pick good, solid technical talks for the VB conference programme, but good talks don't have to be technical and we welcome less technical submissions just as much.

Partner with VB2018 for extra visibility among industry peers

Partnering with the VB conference links your company to a successful and well-established event, demonstrates your commitment to moving the industry forward, allows you to meet potential clients, be visible to industry peers and build lasting…

VB2017 paper: The router of all evil

At VB2017 in Madrid, security researcher Himanshu Anand presented a paper on malware that targets routers, looking both at the topic in general and at some individual case studies. Today we publish both the paper (co-written with Chastine Menrige)…