Ransomware not a problem for half of businesses

Posted by   Martijn Grooten on   Jan 11, 2017

If you are wondering why ransomware continues to thrive, a recent study from IBM Security provides a simple explanation: 70 per cent of the ransomware-infected businesses they surveyed ended up paying the ransom to get their data back.

Clearly this goes against the advice given by many security professionals, which is never to pay the ransom, but as I have argued before, that advice isn't worth much when your valuable data is at stake.

The report does not indicate how many of those who paid the ransom had exhausted all other options, such as recovering the files from a backup or looking for a decryptor. It is possible that some businesses decided simply to pay up for reasons of business continuity. After all, though the ransoms are increasing (20 per cent of corporate victims said they paid more than $40,000), they still tend to be fairly small amounts - in relative terms - for many a business.

But the report contained some good news too: more than half of the businesses surveyed said they had never been affected by ransomware.

Now, industry reports like this are rarely put together with the rigour that would be expected from an academic publication, and they do not claim to be, so one should take these numbers as a very rough approximation at best. Still, it does show that quite a few businesses are doing something right.

Part of this may simply be a matter of luck: ransomware is sometimes used in highly targeted and sophisticated attacks; some businesses simply have not been targeted by such campaigns. (Or, as anyone working in security marketing would tell you: they have not been targeted yet.) But a ransomware infection isn't exactly easy to overlook and every organisation receives many opportunistic attacks every day, so there must be more to this.

We have previously shown how both web and email security solutions can seriously mitigate the threat of modern malware attacks, including ransomware - and that's even before an endpoint security solution gets the chance to block the attack. Other practices, such as staying on top of patching and hardening the systems - can make a great difference too.

Ransomware is unlikely going to go away any time soon, and no doubt cyber crooks will find news ways to infect users and new targets to encrypt. But rather than just panic, maybe we should also look at what actually works against the threat.

cerberransomware_dec2016.png

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 preview: hacking cars

In recent years, car hacking has evolved from a mostly theoretical research field involving giggling researchers and scared journalists, to one that actually concerns car owners and manufacturers. On today's blog we preview two VB2018 papers, by…

Where are all the ‘A’s in APT?

In a guest blog post by VB2018 gold partner Kaspersky Lab, Costin Raiu, Director of the company's Global Research and Analysis Team, looks critically at the 'A' in APT.

VB2018 preview: commercial spyware and its use by governments

Today, we preview three VB2018 presentations that look at threats against civil society in general and the use of commercial spyware by governments for this purpose in particular.

VB2018 preview: Wipers in the wild

Today we preview the VB2018 paper by Saher Naumaan (BAE Systems Applied Intelligence) on the use of wipers in APT attacks.

VB2018 preview: IoT botnets

The VB2018 programme is packed with a wide range of security topics featuring speakers from all around the world. Today we preview two of them: one by Qihoo 360 researchers on tracking variants of Mirai and one by researchers from Bitdefender on the…

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.