NCSC gives important advice on lateral movement

Posted by   Martijn Grooten on   Feb 20, 2018

Though not even a year and a half old, the UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has already managed to make a name for itself through its practical advice and guidance on many security topics.

Earlier this month, the Centre published guidance on lateral movement: the techniques used by an attacker to move through a network once they have gained a foothold.

We tend to underestimate how well many organisations have protected their perimeter: firewalls, as well as email and web security, have become standard and do a good job of keeping most attacks at bay. But at the same time, we often forget that, on the inside, many networks look like open-plan offices and it's often relatively trivial for an attacker, once inside a network, to move to other, more valuable, targets.

That's why I think NCSC's advice is very helpful – and I'd like to add two more pieces of advice of my own.

The first is to include devices that are not directly connected to the Internet in your organisation's patching plan. Vulnerabilities in such devices aren't easily exploited and thus one can easily have an unpatched server or desktop running for years without any incidents – which can give a false sense of security.

That this sense of security really is false was an important lesson learned from WannaCry, the malware that exploited a patched vulnerability in Microsoft's SMB protocol, though which it spread quickly within many organisations' networks. The exploit used by WannaCry has since found its way into other kinds of malware.

 

banner-wannacry-blog.jpg


The second piece of advice is to deploy canaries: digital assets that come in various forms, from documents to (virtual) servers, and that send an alert when someone accesses them.

Unlike honeypots, the goal of these canaries is not to learn more about attackers' methods, but simply to be alerted when someone with possibly malicious intent has gained access to your network. For, as NCSC rightly points out: "you should assume that an attacker with sufficient time and resources will eventually be successful". It is how you detect and respond to such attacks that will make the difference.

How does your organisation prevent and detect lateral movement? We'd like to hear about it, so why not submit a paper for VB2018 (Montreal, 3-5 October 2018)?

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
googleplus.png
reddit.png

 

Latest posts:

VB2018 preview: hacking cars

In recent years, car hacking has evolved from a mostly theoretical research field involving giggling researchers and scared journalists, to one that actually concerns car owners and manufacturers. On today's blog we preview two VB2018 papers, by…

Where are all the ‘A’s in APT?

In a guest blog post by VB2018 gold partner Kaspersky Lab, Costin Raiu, Director of the company's Global Research and Analysis Team, looks critically at the 'A' in APT.

VB2018 preview: commercial spyware and its use by governments

Today, we preview three VB2018 presentations that look at threats against civil society in general and the use of commercial spyware by governments for this purpose in particular.

VB2018 preview: Wipers in the wild

Today we preview the VB2018 paper by Saher Naumaan (BAE Systems Applied Intelligence) on the use of wipers in APT attacks.

VB2018 preview: IoT botnets

The VB2018 programme is packed with a wide range of security topics featuring speakers from all around the world. Today we preview two of them: one by Qihoo 360 researchers on tracking variants of Mirai and one by researchers from Bitdefender on the…

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.